Posted on 02/22/2020 11:29:32 AM PST by kevcol
“And I think: It is time for moral leadership to be restored to the White House,” he said. “So when you are ready to share that deepest truth about yourself, when you are ready to step out of the closet you step out into something hopeful and inclusive, and you look up to Washington and you see a president who cares about you and loves you.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
“Moral leadership” - what a laugh. But not a funny laugh—
Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, not effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
As reported by another Freeper here, the origin appears to be Maltese. Just did a search for ‘ethnic origin of surname Buttigieg’
At first I suspected it could be German, but a check on the christoph-Stoepel.net website indicated the name is not German.
They want their version of morality.
And impose it on everyone else whether they like it or not.
Leftists trying to control language again. They are trying to change the meaning of morality to mean diversity and tolerance. If they succeed, the average person will no longer equate morality with the biblical definition, but with the PC version. The new religion will make traditional religion illegal.
Ironic, isn’t it, that the very ones who are the worst offenders, deem themselves fit to lecture us on how we’re wrong?
Moral leadership? This coming from a Democrat? Trump has treated the office of the presidency with great respect unlike “great” Democrats like JFK, LBJ and Bubba C who treated the White House as their personal brothel!
Maybe in a rural, isolated scenario this sort of thing could flourish. Yet the fact of the matter is on a world scale, half the planet would just as soon push both of them off the roof as negotiate with them. Making this...person the lead representative of our nation would alienate and isolate us in immeasurable ways.
The other day the wife and I were taking our long walk through the string of parks here at home. We passed two women, one morbidly obese and the other just short of average looks with awkward looming glasses.
Both were smiling in a sheepish manner as they passed, off in their own world. I didn’t react or anything, simply taking mental note as I passed with my wife. They looked happy, as if it were the first time they felt that way and were adjusting to it.
My initial reaction was pity. I could only imagine the personal suffering and societal rejection over their lives that made the situation a viable solution. So traumatic it override the most basic biological instinct.
But make no mistake, there was suffering and trauma involved. Something such that it caused them to simply delete their designed programming and who knows else was destroyed in the process? Such is the nature of these things.
I’m not saying they can’t live a good life, or that they are wholesale evil. There is just something wrong here, something out of balance, and we all know it and see it. I don’t want, along with millions of others, to put that in charge of the little red button.
And yet we are considering putting one of these institutionalization candidates into the White House? We just did the undercover communist muslim EEOC thingy and barely survived as a nation.
I think we’re done with the “Let’s out another lefty freak in the White House” game.
“Moral leadership” from supporters of partial-birth abortion (and beyond).
What you do in your bedroom is between you and God. But your public values are my business.
Donald Trump was the first President to enter office being accepting of gay marriage.
Obama was opposed to gay marriage during his first term, but then he “evolved” a few months prior to his second election in 2012.
It was interesting to see Obama finally come around to accepting gay marriage, the position that others such as Dick Cheney had held for years prior.
Spot on!
Get behind me Satan
LOL...IMMORAL.
Yup, he surely knows about morals.
This is an issue where I’m a libertarian. I do not care what Mayor Pete likes to do in the privacy of his bedroom. But he’s a socialist, that’s where I draw the line at.
A pair of homosexuals is going to give the nation moral leadership.
I said it but you said it better.
The father of lies has many agents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.