Posted on 02/20/2020 12:20:23 PM PST by fwdude
Of all the problems with this study, the basic problem is self-report.
Self-report is one of the worst dependent measures you can use even with relatively innocuous questions. As the topic becomes more sensitive, more error is introduced. For example, ‘how tall are you’ and ‘how much do you weigh’ will probably be less accurate than ‘what is your address.’ Teen age boys tend to report taller heights and adult women report lower weight.
Answers to questions about sexual behavior are probably the least accurate, although the order of the categories is probably indicative of relative frequently.
Sloppy, badly written study.
= = =
Totally agree. For all of your reasons.
Wouldnt a lifetime sexual partner only be one?
Best post of the day!
Heh. I used that joke just the other day here at FR.
That thread was later deleted. Not because of my joke mind you.
Because the OP was a moron. But that’s another story in and of itself.
I would imagine there’s also a heightened risk of developing a burning sensation including discoloration in the discharge while urinating.
Oy
Take her out to dinner occasionally, have a nice wine, compliment her, tell her how pretty she is, take her home, give her a whole body massage with quiet music she likes in a dimly lit room and while your cancer risk probably won't change, your chance of getting lucky will.
Trust me. Try it, you'll like it. ;-)
How is Bill Clinton still among the living?
Wilt Chamberlain unavailable for comment.
Go Navy!
“No, its natural for men to screw around. Because its easy.”
Women have as many if not more sex partners than men. Women are masters of discretion when it comes to sex. Women were having booty calls and friends with benefits back in my day even before those terms were used. Women are so discrete most of their girl friends do not know lest they later be called a slut.
I had some crazy drunk college years. So I’m somewhere between 8-15.
There is no way I could remember.
But I would think the “unprotected” kind would make a difference. And if that is the case, it is just 3.
I would speculate that while men have 2 rather small areas permitting viral, fungal, or bacterial entrance, women have 3, one of which has a much larger surface area than that of males, plus a rather constant state of moisture, in that larger area. (Not including oral entry, which, of course, would be of no difference in males, than females).
Then there’s Keith Richards, who no one can explain.
Sounds like Buttigeig and Little Mikey...
Ten sex partners give me cancer, they say?
Well f... erm.. I mean I’m soo scre... I mean oh no!
Unless they mean ten all at once? Not sure I ever done did that.
I know I did five or six in a single night a time or few, but that was overseas and that doesn’t count, right?
Besides, it wasn’t my fault. Foreign TV was terrible and there was nothing else to do.
So am I. When I was in the USAF I was at an ATC base that brought new busloads of women every three days from basic training to their AFSC school. These women had been kept under lock and key for 6-8 weeks at basic training. They had been screened for diseases and isolated from men. They arrived at the base and turned loose to go...where we PDS airmen were waiting to descend upon them like a hawk on a mouse. I'll just say after three years I can refer to sexual partners with an exponent. I settled down after I left the USAF.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.