Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There's no such thing as a free bus
The Hill ^ | February 19, 2020 | Patrick Tuohey

Posted on 02/19/2020 12:14:56 PM PST by karpov

Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) recently told a progressive audience at Howard University that, “Public transit should be free.” This is just the latest call for free transit; the issue has been bubbling up around the country in the past few months, started in large part by some misreporting of events in Kansas City, Missouri.

...

A 2002 study authored by Jennifer Perone and Joel Volinski of the Center for Urban Transportation Research concluded:

"Based upon the findings of this synthesis, it is concluded that a fare-free policy might be appropriate for smaller transit systems in certain communities, but is ill-advised for larger transit systems in major urban areas because experience shows that in larger systems, a tremendous amount of criminal activity, as well as a sharp increase in ridership, caused higher maintenance costs, labor costs, and operational costs and drove away existing riders."

In a 2012 book, “Implementation and Outcomes of Fare-Free Transit Systems,” Volinski details a fare-free pilot program in Austin, Texas. Ridership increased by as much as 70 percent, but there were issues of, “overcrowded buses, disruptive passengers, and unhappy bus operators.” The program was discontinued. Denver tried a similar fare-free program but saw the same results and discontinued it.

Transit passengers say lower fares are not a priority. A 2019 survey of 1,700 riders around the country conducted by TransitCenter found, “What we heard is that most low-income bus riders rate lowering fares as less important than improving the quality of the service.”

NBC News referenced a study by the Center for Economic Information at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. But unfortunately, the “draft mini-report” on fare-free only made matters worse, making bold predictions by omitting any measure of the costs of such a policy.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Massachusetts; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: masstransit; pressley

1 posted on 02/19/2020 12:14:56 PM PST by karpov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: karpov

“... a progressive audience at Howard University”

A ‘progressive’ audience? As if there’s any other kind at Howard university? Tell us about the Conservative, Republican audiences at Howard U, please...


2 posted on 02/19/2020 12:22:04 PM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Howard University... do they have a white safe space?


3 posted on 02/19/2020 12:27:20 PM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Free, huh?


4 posted on 02/19/2020 12:58:57 PM PST by Maceman (People who vote Democrat sell their lives (and ours) to the government and their souls to the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

So I read the study, we should support free subway public transit.

Criminals quickly take over and drive away normal riders.

Maintenance gets deferred, and the system collapses.

Then we can use it for homeless shelters! ;-)


5 posted on 02/19/2020 1:02:14 PM PST by cgbg (The Democratic Party is morphing into the Donner Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) recently told a progressive audience at Howard University that, “Public transit should be free.”

Upon hearing this, one of the attendees at the event told Rep. Pressley that, "My elected representatives should be free."

Rep. Pressley was unavailable for comment.

6 posted on 02/19/2020 1:29:06 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

By free, they mean “paid for by the collectivity.” They are never satisfied. They will continue to demand “free” things, until everything is “free.”

At that moment, the country will have become 100% communist. It’s about 30% already.

Under communism, the collectivity owns everything. There is no private property. The collectivity is the sole employer, and the owner of everything.

The dems are taking us there, a little at a time, until one day everything is “free” and we are all miserable because we have nothing. (But the ruling elite has everything it wants.)


7 posted on 02/19/2020 1:38:57 PM PST by I want the USA back (Journalists Take Bits of Reality and Slot them into the Existing Script. -Friedman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

I taught college economics for more than a decade. My first lesson was always... There is no free lunch plus my colarary there is no free beer either.


8 posted on 02/19/2020 2:41:06 PM PST by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: karpov

The Oregon legislature is now pushing through a bill that would ban the police from investigating or pursing non-payment of a bus fare.


9 posted on 02/19/2020 4:56:10 PM PST by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson