Posted on 02/16/2020 10:44:13 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
The Justice Department announced Friday that it is closing its investigation of Andrew McCabe, the FBIs former deputy director, over his false statements to investigators probing an unauthorized leak that McCabe had orchestrated. McCabe was fired in March 2018, shortly after a blistering Justice Department inspector general (IG) report concluded that he repeatedly and blatantly lied or, as the Bureau lexicon puts it, lacked candor when questioned, including under oath.
Why not indict McCabe on felony false-statements charges? That is the question being pressed by incensed Trump supporters. After all, the constitutional guarantee of equal justice under the law is supposed to mean that McCabe gets the same quality of justice afforded to the sad sacks pursued with unseemly zeal by McCabes FBI and Robert Muellers prosecutors.
George Papadopoulos was convicted of making a trivial false statement about the date of a meeting. Roger Stone was convicted of obstruction long after the special counsel knew there was no TrumpRussia conspiracy, even though his meanderings did not impede the investigation in any meaningful way. And in the case of Michael Flynns false-statements conviction, as McCabe himself acknowledged to the House Intelligence Committee, even the agents who interviewed him did not believe he intentionally misled them.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Gee, anyone detect a pattern?
.
Because we are using somewhat benign. deep state apparatchiks to clean the deep state
Still ineffective
Trump should have pulled someone from outside DC and DOJ
Sidney Powell
Some conservative State AG
anyone but more swamp...
These things happen in Banana Republics.
McCabe made a deal. It looks like the DOJ wants Brennan, Clapper and Comey. Strozk and Page will also see indictments and the star witnesses will be the Ohrs.
No intent?
No controlling legal authority?
There are so many to chose from!
Enjoy the show. Logical thinking and all that.
Yeah. The concept of equal justice under the law is a ruse for the rubes to keep them voting for the foxes overseeing the hen house.
.
Not true.
Plea deals dont allow one to attack the Prosecution and Prosecutors.
And hes publicly denied it, which would ruin his credibility.
This is nothing more than wishful thinking.
.
Can someone post the PDJT quote where he said, “we caught them, we have them all”? Or something like that...I believe him...it may happen not like we think, though...and when did he say this?
President Trump Starts to Drain the Swamp, Yanks Jessie Liu Treasury Dept. Nomination (FR Post)
Many here on FR will remember that Adams wrote many fine articles about the horrendous abuses in the Obama Voting Rights Section at DOJ during his tenure there. He is now an election lawyer. His New York Times bestselling book is Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department (Regnery). His website is www.electionlawcenter.com.
He needs to get a private citizen who does not care how many careers he/she destroys nor the amount of carnage caused in the private lives of these leaches to clean house, and to do it with absolute ruthlessness.
,
Damn, youre good.
.
Trust Sessions
“Mueller’s Maulers” ... apt description.
Here’s an interesting take on things:
The Sentencing of Michael Flynn Represents a Very Big Problem for AG Bill Barr
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/02/15/the-sentencing-of-michael-flynn-represents-a-very-big-problem-for-ag-bill-barr/
For the past week CTH has been outlining some lengthy research, highlighting key issues to help understand the background of what is evident. If youve followed along, in this outline the individual pieces will all come together. Bill Barr has a very big problem
Andrew McCabe cannot be prosecuted in 2020 for the same reason James Wolfe could not be prosecuted in 2018. When we understand why we realize the problem that Michael Flynn now represents to U.S. Attorney Bill Barr.
Continued at link.
Oh, I do! With all my heart!
Thank you! PDJT has not failed to do what he said he would do.
From AG Barrs perspective, theres no way the institutions of government could survive the potential evidence at a McCabe trial.
AG Barr cant possibly be this delusional. NAMBLA and ISIS deserve more public respect than the DOJ right now. Barr has to know this better than anyone.
Im at the point where I wouldnt even vote to convict a defendant in a case where the evidence against him was 100% certain. Im sure Im far from the only one who operates this way. How do the institutions of government hold up under that kind of scenario?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.