Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/08/2020 10:09:02 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

Google up “ATF Institutional Perjury” sometime. They’ve been doing it for decades.

L


2 posted on 02/08/2020 10:11:12 AM PST by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

shall not be infringed


3 posted on 02/08/2020 10:14:11 AM PST by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Criminals will always be able to get guns.

The American “war on drugs” is in its 111th year. Law enforcement is being beat in every town and city I could name.


4 posted on 02/08/2020 10:17:31 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Chinese are happy to make things for money.


5 posted on 02/08/2020 10:19:06 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The NRA should offer gun making workshops for leftist legislators so the leftists understand that “gun control” is as impossible as me flying to Richmond, Virgina by beating my arms furiously.


7 posted on 02/08/2020 10:21:09 AM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I'm no expert on any part of the Constitution...and that goes double for the 2nd Amendment. But there's one thing I'm sure of: no state,county or municipality should have the legal authority to regulate in *any* way the manufacture,sale,purchase,possession or reasonable use (that is,except when use of a firearm is connected to a crime) of a firearm. The only legislative body that should have the authority to do so is the United States Congress...House and Senate.

And,of course,any such laws passed by Congress would be subject to Constitutional scrutiny by the Federal courts as are all other laws passed by Congress.

The state I live in is bordered by two states that basically have no laws restricting firearm purchase or possession yet in my state you have to know a politician or a police chief to even possess a stun gun,let alone a firearm.

8 posted on 02/08/2020 10:21:11 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (The Rats Can't Get Over The Fact That They Lost A Rigged Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I find this news surprising - not the fact that ATF is violating the law but that one of their (former) agents continues to testify on the side of truth. That’s a better percentage than I expect from BATFE.


10 posted on 02/08/2020 10:24:04 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Dump GCA 68 and NFA 34. Get back to the guarantee as written and quit guessing what the founders thought.


13 posted on 02/08/2020 10:27:18 AM PST by rktman ( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
the article avoids stating the details of the law or what is in "conflict".

Under the US Code of Federal Regulations, a firearm frame or receiver is defined as: “That part of a firearm which provides housing for the hammer, bolt or breechblock, and firing mechanism, and which is usually threaded at its forward portion to receive the barrel.”

A quick review of the AR-15 lower:
-houses the hammer [check]
-houses the bolt [nope]
-houses the breachblock - i.e. closes the chamber [nope]
-houses the firing mechanism - firing pin [nope]

14 posted on 02/08/2020 10:30:02 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
the ATF has been deliberately misinterpreting a key gun control regulation for decades

The idiots at CNN completely miss the significance this sentence.

Innumerable people have been arrested and had their lives ruined for not breaking the law because the ATF determined that's what should be.

All the baloney about evil criminals, making innumerable numbers of AR-15s to terrorize the general population is complete hogwash.

Even in some bizarre Universe if that were true, The ATF is not protecting anyone by putting citizens who have not broken the law into jail. The ATF is in violation of the law not the people. The policymakers at the ATF should be in jail. This is a rogue government agency that decides who should be free who should be arrested based on their own criteria and the hell with the law. This is despotism in its purest sense.

17 posted on 02/08/2020 10:33:03 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The ATF expressly and specifically said that bumps stocks were not regulated by law. With no action by congress, they are now illegal to possess. I’m still trying to figure out how that works.


23 posted on 02/08/2020 10:54:01 AM PST by suthener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You can bet the number of crimes committed with AR-15s built on home finished receivers is insignificant, if not immeasurable. And what might be the statistics on crimes being solved because most firearms used in crimes are factory built and the most recent legal owner completed a Form 4473 & was NICSed?


55 posted on 02/08/2020 5:53:05 PM PST by Blue Collar Christian (I'm a nationalist.I'm white.Does that mean I'm racist?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson