Posted on 02/04/2020 2:14:00 PM PST by Trump20162020
Pete Buttigieg: 36,262 (26.9%)
Bernie Sanders: 33,793 (25.1%)
Elizabeth Warren: 24,623 (18.3%)
Joseph R. Biden Jr.: 21,038 (15.6%)
Amy Klobuchar: 16,972 (12.6%)
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
I’m guessing that when all the counting is done Bernie will be the winner and Biden will be 5th...
Took ‘em all day to find a way to nudge Joe over 15%, eh?
In what?
Perhaps Hillaryous Rotten Criminal can practice coin flipping with Peter. Hold the salad tossing. Petey’s got that well-oiled machine working for him.
#RUSerious
“Flip a coin.”
Does Butticheck get heads or tails?
The guy in charge just said on a radio interview that he was unaware of any offer from Homeland security to help. ....hell. Even I knew about the offer. ....the guy is lying big time. ....why?
Been saying since he entered that Mayor Pete is deep state. Also, I still think his purpose is VP candidate, but we will see.
Biden has to be livid about the impeachment fiasco. Just in time for the first primary, he was hammered daily about his and Hunter’s corruption in Ukraine. Even brain dead dem voters know he is radioactive and they are jumping ship. Very surprised they are going to Buttigeig, but I guess he is less radical than Bernie and Warren. Was this Pelosi’s plan with her month long delay?
We were supposed to choose our candidate (I went with Yang FWIW), and then count people, and report that. In my little precinct of 82 people, there were 8 people there for Steyer and 3 for Yang, among others. They were supposed to get a pre-viability tally. Yang and Steyer were not viable (in my precinct, needed 13), so they just said, "regroup". So we did, got every one in a viable candidate, and then they did the official count. So they did not report any initial votes for Steyer or Yang.
So when I see below that Steyer only had 240 votes, when my little dinky precinct had 8 people there for him, that is a crock. Not sticking up for Steyer, but just saying, they are under counting people like Steyer and Yang who generally weren't viable, but did have some initial amount of support.
Ultimately, it is the delegate count that matters, but this count is a supposed pre-viability tally, and I don't believe the counts at all for the lesser candidates.
I wouldn't trust these Democrats to put on a bake sale for the local little league. And FWIW, I really don't think there is anything shady going on. This is strictly incompetence.
A partial result .
They wont know fir weeks.
Hillary won’t be the nominee in 2020. The Dems are done with her. The beat Trump “moderate” candidate is Bloomberg.
Biden led in all of four out of 99 counties in Iowa.
He seemed pretty confident he won before a single vote was counted. Seems shady to me. Bernie Sanders is not going to be allowed to win. Even if he ends up winning Iowa it’ll be announced when it’s too late to help
62% In.
Ride him Pete!
Ride him like a dog!
Make him bark!
Kobuchar has no charisma.
She reminds folks of the sour puss female boss at their first job after turning 16.
Absolutely! It could happen in 2020, and wouldn't it be amazing. Even if the black male vote is "only" say 30% it would be epic.
Yep and that long to put Buttigieg in first rather than Sanders. I'm guessing when all the votes are in Sander's will be first and Biden will be 5th.
Oh, so now it is
#ShadowPete
#MayorCheat
Interesting time.
It teaches next round of Dem candidates to game the system. Nobody is EVER going to trust anything anymore.
Indeed!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.