[Libloather]

“That means the president would have been able to cheat in the next election with impunity because they could have simply delayed and played out the clock,” he responded.

Election around the corner and Schiffty was on the clock. The RATS screwed up. Time to pay for that mistake.

[MrHead]

Don’t start an impeachment, that would be different.

[JPJones]

“Look, there’s nothing that I can see that we could have done differently because as the senators have already admitted, we proved our case.”

There’s spin and then there’s DELUSION.

[Fungi]

How about telling the truth Schitt face?

[From The Deer Stand]

You could have been fair and truthful.

[BookmanTheJanitor]

Buck up, Adam.

[Gahanna Bob]

The House managers could have taken their 4 hour of material and presented it in 4 hours instead of 21. It was painful to watch all the repetitiveness.

That defense team actually had more material and took half the time.

[GaryCrow]

There was never anything there to prove. All they proved is that you can’t make up something out of thin air and have people believe it. “Just because” isn’t a valid reason to remove a president from office.

[smvoice]

Lol! I don't know Schiff. If you could have beat Nadler to the podium, you MIGHT have turned this thing around in your favor ...or not.. we'll never know 🍿!

[bleach]

That’s because the President did nothing, arse face.

[Ratman0823]

Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), the lead House manager in President Trump's Senate trial, said Sunday that there is nothing Democrats could have done differently during the impeachment process.

Well, it should have died in Schitt-for-brain's committee for lack of anything impeachable. All he did by pushing forward this crap sandwich was to expose his own party to total ridicule come November. Except maybe one the West Coast and the Northeast.

[EQAndyBuzz]

They could have given the defense their witnesses to interview. They could have not waited 33 days before presenting the articles to the Senate. Pelosi could have followed rules and put the impeachment to the caucus for a vote before telling Schiff and Nadler to go ahead with the impeachment. Schiff, Nadler and the other cretins on the left could have presented witnesses who actually saw something. And on and on and on.

[Pilgrim's Progress]

Well, you could have waited until you had a real crime. Of course, you’d have to look to your own party to find one.

[PigRigger]

How much can you do when no crime was v
committed other than not submit the articles to begin with?

[Sarah Barracuda]

Ed Buck’s best buddy will probably run for Feinstein’s seat since she is retiring..even though he doesn’t give a rats behind about his own district, full of hobos and feces he has the vote locked in

[pgyanke]

They could have tried following the law...

[faithhopecharity]

Don’t screw with our constitution. Don’t charge any impeachment without any impeachable crimes. Don’t embarrass yourselves inflicting this crap on our country. Those things would have been different.

[OrioleFan]

If you haven’t got it, don’t make it up, pencil neck.

[Secret Agent Man]

Self censored post.

[Williams]

Nothing could have been done different.

YOU CAN ACT LIKE A MAN!

[Gay State Conservative]

Another lie. The Rats could have presented evidence of actual wrongdoing.