Nanzi doesn’t care.
She’s going to do it again, anyway.
I think the President’s team has very poorly communicated that House Managers are asking for TWO outcomes: (1) President Trump should be removed from office; AND (2) President Trump should never be allowed to hold public office again, meaning that he would NOT be eligible to run for President this year.
The President’s team hints at this when they talk about “removal from the ballot” and “interfering with the 2020 election.” But I have not yet heard them say, “They don’t just want to remove him from office; they want to prevent you from ever being able to vote for him again.”
I think if #1 makes people angry, #2 should enrage them, but most people just don’t know.
Why is no one talking about this???
Just heads up. Lamar will let decision be known within an hour
It’s a coup.
Not a trial.
VOTING NO!!!!!!!
Lamar is voting NO!!!
Bet Bernie, Warren and Clobachar are pissed. Goodbye Iowa! Lol!
Bookmark
President Trump is, by nature, a deal maker.
The Democrats are trying to turn Trump's positive into a negative by claiming that Trump's "deals" are impeachable "quid pro quo" schemes for personal benefit in the election.
Trump's defense team is saying that all politicians, at heart, feel they are the most qualified and therefore electing them over their opponents is in the national interest. Trump's skill at deal-making is what makes him better than his opponents, his deal-making is in the national interest, and his success at deal-making in the national interest benefits his reelection.
The Democrats' argument is absurd if it is applied to the economy. Most people say that a President benefits from a good economy and that voters will reward the incumbent if the economy is good no matter how much or how little the President's policies contributed to improving the economy.
Is it Schiff's contention that policies to improve the economy, and by extension improve the President's chances of reelection, are now by definition impeachable offenses because the President had *some* personal reelection motives behind his policies?
-PJ
Its over. There will be no witnesses. It should be wrapped up by tomorrow night.
I wonder if any House Dems will resign or not seek reelection out of shame? Doubtful, but holding out hope that a few will.
It is DEFINITELY in the national interest for a sitting president to investigate a presidential candidate who has been revealed to have committed REAL Quid Pro Quo’s while he was VP.
Why wouldn’t the country benefit by this type of vetting out of an obviously corrupt candidate? It’s a healthy thing to do for the country.
The evidence proving Biden’s corrupt Quid Pro Quo has been in the public domain for quite some time, including the Biden S.O.B youtube video. It’s obvious.
Romney?
Murkowski?
THROW THEM OUT OF THE PARTY.