Posted on 01/29/2020 9:59:29 AM PST by SeekAndFind
As China attempts to contain the spread of a new coronavirus that has left more than 100 people dead, rumors and disinformation have spread amid the scramble for answers.
Some of the speculation has centered on a virology institute in Wuhan, the city where the outbreak began. One fringe theory holds that the disaster could be the accidental result of biological weapons research.
But in conversations with The Washington Post, experts rejected the idea that the virus could be man-made.
“Based on the virus genome and properties there is no indication whatsoever that it was an engineered virus,” said Richard Ebright, a professor of chemical biology at Rutgers University.
Tim Trevan, a biological safety expert based in Maryland, said most countries had largely abandoned their bioweapons research after years of work proved fruitless.
“The vast majority of new, nasty diseases ... come from nature,” he said.
The British newspaper Daily Mail was among the first to suggest the possibility of a link between the newly spreading virus and the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, reporting last week that the lab, which opened in 2014 and is part of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, had been the subject of safety concerns in the past.
A separate article published by the Washington Times, a conservative newspaper in Washington, took the theories a step further, suggesting in a headline that the “Coronavirus may have originated in lab linked to China’s biowarfare program” and pointing to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
The article cited research by Dany Shoham, a former Israeli military intelligence officer, who told The Post he did not want to comment further.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I need to add “debunked” to my media newspeak translation guide.
“Debunked” = NOT UNproven True, or: Something that viscerally goes against the Fake News narrative and must be immediately dismissed without any actual evidence to support it being factually proven false.
i.e. “Pizzagate was debunked.”
“Barack Obama being Muslim was debunked.”
Uh oh...WaPo says it is “debunked.”
That’s a confirmation if I ever heard one. Where’s my N95 mask stash?
I just love it when experts ‘debunk’ things for us.
Joe Biden’s corrupt quid pro quo with the previous Ukraine administration was “debunked”
Is there a “Department of Debunking”?
They think it means “You’re an uneducated southern boob who speaks funny.”
(Snort) More “Experts” being trotted out.
Sorry, but I should totally trust the WaPo track record...NOT.
You see them every day, they're all on this site........LOL!
From now on, any time an academic defends CCP/PLA I’ll remember this:
That’s another way of saying unsupported, but not debunked. There’s a vast difference between this theory and the JFK assassination thing. The US is an open society, and people who might have been involved in pulling levers in the background can disclose things to reporters without anyone finding out who they are. Whereas China is a country where disclosing something the government doesn’t want publicized can get you killed on charges of espionage/treason, because the government will simply torture the journalists involved until they give up their source(s).
Never believe any story until...........oh crap.....is that.....the.......fat....lady......
Exactly, experts say Trump colluded and needs to be impeached. F these “experts”
I can’t read the whole story thus I can’t evaluate.
Are they saying that they have looked at the actual virus obtained from a patient and there is no way it could be man made like the Chapel Hill China Bat/Sars virus.
Now I am really worried. Almost confirmation that it was.
However, Richard Ebright has no clue as to why almost half of the 2019-nCoV virus genome does not match nor is it related to the genome of any other corona virus.
“You see them every day, they’re all on this site........LOL!”
I know I’ve encountered my share lately - and they’re confident experts, undeterred by facts or logic.
Experts say what they’re told to say. That’s their job.
How do you know the Washington Post is lying?
It prints something.
RE: Richard Ebright has no clue as to why almost half of the 2019-nCoV virus genome does not match nor is it related to the genome of any other corona virus.
That’s interesting. Which source ( reliable please ) tells us this? Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.