Skip to comments.
New Scalia Rising? Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch warns judicial activists he's coming for them
American Thinker ^
| 01/28/2020
| Monica Showalter
Posted on 01/28/2020 7:44:31 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: frank ballenger
Re Fishing Lodge:
Yeah, that whole affair still stinks like hell.
They got away with murder. Again.
21
posted on
01/28/2020 8:43:36 AM PST
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: thoughtomator
RE: it would be sweet, sweet revenge for Podestas murder of Scalia
You have good evidence for this?
22
posted on
01/28/2020 8:44:36 AM PST
by
SeekAndFind
(look at Michigan, it will)
To: SeekAndFind
that would be the discussion of “wetworks” directly referring to the time and place of Scalia’s passing, as exposed in Podesta’s emails
23
posted on
01/28/2020 8:52:45 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(... this has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.)
To: SeekAndFind
Good that the Supremes see the problem, but Congress is the one who should be deciding judicial scope.
24
posted on
01/28/2020 8:53:34 AM PST
by
lurk
To: SeekAndFind
The Democrats want to end all Christian religion especially any association with education.
25
posted on
01/28/2020 8:54:52 AM PST
by
cnsmom
To: Lurkinanloomin
To: frank ballenger
man there were some things about him that had me thinking here’s a lib-—boy was I wrong!
GREAT DAY!!
To: SeekAndFind
Does anyone have the case name that is being discussed? Sometimes it’s hard to find stuff at the SC site, without the name. I really wish news articles would at least mention that critical information that is relevant to the story.
28
posted on
01/28/2020 9:43:24 AM PST
by
zeugma
(I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
To: SeekAndFind
He should of glared at the 4 Supreme Court Justices who disagreed.
29
posted on
01/28/2020 10:03:04 AM PST
by
PROCON
(Molon Labe)
To: zeugma
30
posted on
01/28/2020 10:04:58 AM PST
by
PROCON
(Molon Labe)
To: SeekAndFind
For those of you who might be interested in reading this missive by Gorsuch, you can find it
here. The case is Department of Homeland Security v. New York, and can be found at the Supreme Court's
Opinions related to orders page.
31
posted on
01/28/2020 10:15:57 AM PST
by
zeugma
(I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
To: PROCON
Thanks! Now, if we could only train reporters to actually do their jobs and report the relevant facts... I know not gonna happen...
32
posted on
01/28/2020 10:21:25 AM PST
by
zeugma
(I sure wish I lived in a country where the rule of law actually applied to those in power.)
To: SeekAndFind
The President could easily shut down judicial activism by ignoring any such judicial orders that are beyond the scope of the cases presented to their courts.
Tell them to send it to the USSC if they want it applied nationwide.
33
posted on
01/28/2020 10:59:06 AM PST
by
MeganC
(There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
To: SeekAndFind
Hmmm.. Seems I recently read something about storm clouds, thunder and wind but no rain...
34
posted on
01/28/2020 12:36:16 PM PST
by
unread
(A REPUBLIC..! if you can keep it....)
To: MeganC
35
posted on
01/28/2020 12:36:57 PM PST
by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Is the era of Big Judicial Activism over? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Not until John Roberts is replaced as Chief Justice.
Partner, u ain't lying.
Chief Justice Roberts is a "Piece of Work".
To: lurk
“....but Congress is the one who should be deciding judicial scope.”’
_______________________________________________
Good luck getting them to step up and do that.
37
posted on
01/28/2020 1:43:09 PM PST
by
Bishop_Malachi
(Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
To: Lurkinanloomin
Roberts and Kavanaugh dicey.
38
posted on
01/28/2020 3:34:24 PM PST
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: SeekAndFind
This really should be a simple thing. A judge can only do anything within his area of responsibility. If he really feels the injunction should be more, he has a direct line to a superior court, who can make an immediate emergency ruling on a wider injunction. And if they feel it should be wider/nationwide, they can make an immediate emergency appeal to district/Supremes for that.
And if any judges start abusing this, then the higher courts will probably just start auto-declining all of their attempts.
To: Bonemaker
40
posted on
01/28/2020 6:34:37 PM PST
by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson