China's coronavirus outbreak looks worse than the Chicoms are admitting

Communist regimes are famous for concealing inconvenient information and that appears to be the case in China with the spread of the coronavirus, a SARS-linked pneumonia-like flu that reportedly has killed 26, infected nearly a thousand, and spread to to more than a half a dozen countries beyond China, including the U.S. The Chinese have got 20 million people on lockdown in Wuhan and several cities near it, just as the Chinese New Year begins, which is the entire region's biggest holiday.

It's pretty obvious the epidemic is spreading anyway. Officials, culpably or not, closed the barn door after the horse got out.

According to the Associated Press:

China’s National Health Commission said the confirmed cases of the new coronavirus had risen to 830 with 25 deaths. The first death was also confirmed outside the central province of Hubei, where the capital, Wuhan, has been the epicenter of the outbreak. The health commission in Hebei, a northern province bordering Beijing, said an 80-year-old man died after returning from a two-month stay in Wuhan to see relatives.

The vast majority of cases have been in and around Wuhan or people with connections the city. Other cases have been confirmed in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Thailand. Singapore and Vietnam reported their first cases Thursday, and cases have also been confirmed in the Chinese territories of Hong Kong and Macao.

Here's the evidence that they're concealing just how bad it is:

First, whether through incompetence or design, they've seemingly ignored their obligation to set up safety measures, described below. Worse still, they have destroyed the evidence of the disease's origin by scrubbing out the market for exotic food that is the top suspect in the virus's origin, making it now practically impossible to trace,

Have you ever watched the Babylon 5 episode "Confessions and Lamentations"? The MedSci might be a little weak in spots (why the heck would Delenn and Lennier go into the quarantine zone to minister to the afflicted without ANY sort of futuristic breathing protection?!), but, the writer really nailed the sense and reality of so many people reacting irrationally, creating scapegoats, etc. All these are distractions to solving the problem & reducing it's likelihood in the future.

At the end, the Dr. who comes up with the cure just shakes his head and walks off.

Nature comes up with nasty bugs all on its own.

Yup.

Especially when Man gives Nature a great environment to work in. Good explanation here: (not for you, it's for the ill-informed, knee-knockers, closet racists and knee-jerkers on this forum)

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3810083/posts?page=11#11

We have NO idea where the mutation that created this virus originally came from. Wuhan is a MAJOR transportation hub. The actual mutation could have occurred on a farm in the countryside, with a good chance of the newly minted virus being transported to Wuhan. Or it could be from animals being raised in a Wuhan resident’s backyard and slaughtered in iffy environments — VERY VERY common in Asia. We just don’t know, and may never really know precisely.

Good explanation here:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3810083/posts?page=11#11

(CC’ing Mariner so he / she knows I posted this link - you may have “incoming”, but I think it’s important for people to know how easily Nature can generate new diseases, esp. given an ideal environment.)

The reality is that every major country, and some lesser ones, likely have some sort of bioweapons research program going on. And, even if it is only defensive in intent, you have to have something for the antidotes to be tested on.

However, if I wanted to do “secret” or outlawed work, I certainly would not do it in a very well known facility in a populous area. (Even the idea of “The Purloined Letter” only goes so far!) So, the notion that this disease came from a bioweapons lab in Wuhan is not impossible, but it is MUCH more unlikely than Nature’s own propensity for cranking up dangerous new variants of existing pathogens. (What, are we going to blame with no evidence the next flu strain that kills 10’s of thousands of people on a bioweapons lab, too?)

At any rate, I apologize for those of my countrymen/women who speak (write) out of fear and ignorance to the point of irrationality, racism, foolishness, and so on. Sometimes it is their own doing, but very often they are being used. It is much the same in any country, right?

“We have NO idea where the mutation that created this virus originally came from.”
______________________

Point taken; and if the epicenter of the outbreak had occurred anywhere other than the single city in China where they have recently constructed their only Level 4 biosafety lab I would agree w/you. That lab was constructed in response to the SARS virus outbreak and is heavily involved w/research that involves various Corona viruses and particularly animal to human transmission. These type facilities are classified as “dual use;” so, it is well known they can be used for manufacturing bioweapons.

I’m not saying your explanation is incorrect; however, to me the odds favor the bio lab.

https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

Click on Hubei and get:

Confirmed Cases: Hubei
Province/State Hubei
Country/Region Mainland China
Last Update 1/24/2020 12pm
Lat 30.98
Long 112.27
Confirmed 549
Suspected
Recovered 31
Deaths 24
ConfnSusp 549

The ‘recovered’ vs ‘deaths’ isn’t very encouraging.

I look at it the other way - that Lab is unlikely to be involved in bioweapons research (see another of my posts above), and even if it was, there’d be even MORE internal containment precautions in the bioweapons section. The last thing the Chinese gov’t would want is a scenario that damages their economy — and that’s exactly where it looks like this is heading.

That fear also explains the seemingly drastic (but may be too late) containment actions: Quarantining several cities is an economic blow, but nothing like the damage if this virus rampages throughout the country.

I’m not saying a lab sourced outbreak is “impossible”, just “unlikely”.

Now, compare that to the immediate region, where you have not just thousands, but probably hundreds of thousands of nice incubators of all sizes (large operations down to backyard livestock slaughtering), with little or no rules, almost no inspections, and Wuhan is a major transportation hub... I’ll post this yet again:

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3810083/posts?page=11#11

There are very good reasons why disease outbreaks emanate from China so frequently, especially now that they’ve built a tremendous transportation system.

Interesting link here, as 2019-nCoV is almost like an extra nasty cold virus:

http://jamaicahospital.org/newsletter/how-long-can-viruses-live-outside-the-body/

Note that the common cold virus can survive on an indoor surface for a week, but capability of infection is low after 24 hours.

However... The article also notes that viruses tend to live longer on cool surfaces, so further retention of significant communicability in cool conditions might not be unusual at all.

No, the ChiComs are freaking out because this looks like it is going to be a kick in the teeth to their economy, plus there is the human angle for some. The Chinese in general still greatly respect their elderly - and that’s who’ll likely be hit worst.

Also... IF 2019-nCoV was from that lab, then that lab would have heads up info. on the pathogen, a vaccine, and so on. Their reaction says they DON’T have that.

I see your point and you may be correct. We're certainly in agreement as to the adverse economic impact this event will have on China. That said,, you might want to read this excerpt from the Feb 2017 issue of Nature regarding the facility at Wuhan. (Entire article is linked below):

“But worries surround the (Wuhan) lab, too. The SARS virus has escaped from high-level containment facilities in Beijing multiple times, notes Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey. Tim Trevan, founder of CHROME Biosafety and Biosecurity Consulting in Damascus, Maryland, says that an open culture is important to keeping BSL-4 labs safe, and he questions how easy this will be in China, where society emphasizes hierarchy. ‘Diversity of viewpoint, flat structures where everyone feels free to speak up and openness of information are important,’ he says.”

https://www.nature.com/news/inside-the-chinese-lab-poised-to-study-world-s-most-dangerous-pathogens-1.21487

Hmm... It seems that a good guide / comparison would be those SARS breakouts from facilities in Beijing. IF anyone has info. on what transpired thereafter.

However, the Wuhan lab is both newer and higher level, and, that same article points out the steps taken to overcome the potential problems stated in your excerpt. (Reading further, that Ebright fellow doesn’t seem to want any more labs anywhere, which is just “nuts”.)

That doesn’t eliminate the lab a source - I just think it’s less likely than the biological “soup” of the region.

The biggest problem I have is that we get some people talking like this instance is some sort of escaped bioweapon on the rampage, and panicking themselves or others. (If this is a bioweapon, it is a damn poor one.)

Wherever it came from, I think we can agree it is getting a lot of “hype” right now and a lot of the posting on it seems to be slanted towards the “worst possible case.” The virus would certainly be a lousy bioweapon for any major world power to unleash; as it is likely to do a lot of economic damage to them. That said, if it was a rogue country like North Korea or Iran; perhaps it would take some of the current “heat” off them (assuming plausible deniability).

It certainly deserves our attention; however, I think “feeding” the current panic/hyperbole surrounding it is unwise; at least until we have more hard facts and enlightened professional analysis. For that reason, I'm going to stand down for the time being. I do appreciate your point of view and polite discussion. Thx!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.