Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

Or they could simply interview people behind the scenes having knowledge of events, including Ciaramella, such that whatever he says to investigators is under oath.

Not singling him out, but including him.


51 posted on 01/23/2020 8:43:42 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: marron

Everyone accused has the right to face their accuser. We need a show of hands in the Senate - who is willing to go on trial without knowing who their accuser is?? Too simplistic? Probably!

Bring on the accuser! Why should it be any more difficult than that? Tell those self important House Managers to bring him in or there will not be any further proceedings! That’s how this started and that’s where it needs to end!


57 posted on 01/23/2020 9:17:48 AM PST by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: marron
Or they could simply interview people behind the scenes having knowledge of events, including Ciaramella, such that whatever he says to investigators is under oath.

That's just a wild goose chase.

The process is much easier than that. The Trump defense team should simply demand to see the original whistleblower's complaint, along with the transcript of the testimony of Inspector General Michael Atkinson (who handled the complaint) before Schiff's secret House committee hearing.

61 posted on 01/23/2020 9:32:05 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson