Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marron
Or they could simply interview people behind the scenes having knowledge of events, including Ciaramella, such that whatever he says to investigators is under oath.

That's just a wild goose chase.

The process is much easier than that. The Trump defense team should simply demand to see the original whistleblower's complaint, along with the transcript of the testimony of Inspector General Michael Atkinson (who handled the complaint) before Schiff's secret House committee hearing.

61 posted on 01/23/2020 9:32:05 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The reason I believe that whistleblower IS Eric Ciramella, is he would have publicly came forward and denied it if he wasn’t. Think about it if they named you and you weren’t the WH.... I’d get a lawyer and have a statement out the next day.


62 posted on 01/23/2020 9:43:54 AM PST by gswilder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson