Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/19/2020 7:24:35 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

Absent historical context, ___________________ can be overhyped in ways that lead uninformed voters...

Fill in the blank (hint - D’rat, MSM nd SJW ‘big issues’).


2 posted on 01/19/2020 7:35:48 AM PST by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The last climate change event occurred 12,800 years ago when the Earth passed through a dense part of the Taurid astroid cloud - a bombardment with several 1 mile rocks and other smaller debris lasting 100 years.


3 posted on 01/19/2020 7:41:03 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Warning - the sun is going down tonight. Without the sun, we will all freeze to death.

We need to provide all of our resources to the government by this afternoon so they can provide life saving warmth.


4 posted on 01/19/2020 7:41:51 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I was just looking over some ice core sample CO2 and temperature graphs. Interestingly, there have been significant ups and downs over the last 100,000 years. And very interestingly, the "global warming" websites only feature the last "up", making it look like previous levels were low and only now do we see a big spike. If you look at the WHOLE last 100,000 years, you can see that there were previous large spikes as well, quite before the Industrial Revolution.


5 posted on 01/19/2020 7:45:37 AM PST by EinNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

6 posted on 01/19/2020 7:54:15 AM PST by reintarnation (not a noob, i just change my identity over the years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Good article. To add to his list...
The Great Fire of 1910 was a wildfire in the western United States that burned three million acres (4,700 sq miles) in North Idaho and Western Montana, with extensions into Eastern Washington and Southeast British Columbia, in the summer of 1910. The extensive burned area was approximately the size of the state of Connecticut. Interestingly, the fire burned over two days on the weekend of August 20–21, after strong winds caused numerous smaller fires to combine into a firestorm of unprecedented size. It killed 87 people, mostly firefighters. It is believed to be the largest, although not the deadliest, forest fire in U.S. history.

All the doomsaying-climatistas say all the California wildfires are indisputably the result of Global Warming / Climate Change. That's a load of BS.

Here's an interesting aside from Wiki that reveals why today's fires are so big -->

The Great Fire of 1910 cemented and shaped the U.S. Forest Service, which at the time was a newly established department on the verge of cancellation, facing opposition from mining and forestry interests. Before the epic conflagration, there were many debates about the best way to handle forest fires—whether to let them burn because they were a part of nature and were expensive to fight, or to fight them in order to protect the forests.

One of the people who fought the fire, Ferdinand Silcox, went on to become the fifth chief of the fire service. Influenced by the devastation of the Big Blowup, Silcox promoted the "10 a.m." policy, with the goal of suppressing all fires by 10 a.m. of the day following their report. It was decided that the Forest Service was to prevent and battle every wildfire. More recently, this absolutist attitude to wildfires has been criticized for altering the natural disturbance mechanisms that drive forest ecosystem structure, which paradoxically increases the destructive potential of forest fires.


9 posted on 01/19/2020 7:55:51 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
● The Great Hurricane of 1780 killed 30,000 people in the Caribbean.

That was one of several major hurricanes in 1780 alone. Major hurricane counts:

Years Puerto Rico Jamaica Bermuda
1501–50 7 0 -
1551–1600 2 1 -
1601–50 3 0 8
1651–1700 2 4 2
1701–50 9 8 6
1751–1800 10 12 5
1801–50 13 11 9
1851–1900 6 5 10
1901–50 6 5 11
1951–98 2 2 6

12 posted on 01/19/2020 8:12:25 AM PST by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways to Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Looks like the alarmists are shifting their scare focus from Greenland to Antarctica. Perform a google search on “Antarctic ice cap melting”. Google will offer articles detailing hundreds of absurd predictions that have not and will not come to pass. If one performed the same search 10 years ago, you would see a never ending list of the same articles going back to the 1990s. Insanity


18 posted on 01/19/2020 8:32:37 AM PST by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; azishot; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; ..

p


24 posted on 01/19/2020 9:40:15 AM PST by bitt (A FRIVOLOUS impeachment vote is a SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Epic dust storms in the 1930s caused catastrophic ecological damage to the Central Plains of the U.S. and Canada.

That was caused by bad farming practices. Is there any serious dispute about that? Humans can cause both good and bad environmental effects, and can reverse them if it becomes necessary.

29 posted on 01/19/2020 9:58:47 AM PST by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

In October 2018, we lost our home and most of our belongings in a flood. I have had friends from around the country suggest that this is proof of Global Warming.

Over 80 years before, in 1936, my grandparents lost their home and all of their belongings in a flood. Before their home washed down the Colorado River, it was located about 50 feet from where ours is located now.

This is not Global Warming. It is called weather. Sometimes the weather is bad. Sometimes the weather is very bad. I have long described Central Texas weather as a series of droughts separated by floods.

This has always been and always will be the nature of weather. I am really tired of every bad weather event being attributed to Global Warming.


30 posted on 01/19/2020 10:39:50 AM PST by kennedy (No relation to those other Kennedys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Earth Enters Unknown as Magnetic North Pole Continues Push Toward Russia, Crosses Greenwich Meridian
Sputniknews.com ^ | 15:08 13.12.2019 (updated 15:42 13.12.2019) | Staff
posted in the Free Republic Aggregate conservative news site
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3800727/posts
Posted on 12/13/2019, 4:22:18 PM by Red Badger

Earlier this year, US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the British Geological Survey (BGS) were forced to update the World Magnetic Model a year ahead of schedule due to the speed with which the magnetic north pole is shifting out of the Canadian Arctic and toward Russia’s Siberia.

Deep solar minimum on the verge of an historic milestone
wattsupwiththat.com ^ | December 12, 2019 | by Paul Dorian

Posted on 12/13/2019, 3:17:04 PM by Red Badger Posted in the Free Republic aggregate news site http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3800719/posts

Solar minimum is a normal part of the 11-year sunspot cycle, but the last one and the current one have been far deeper than most. One of the consequences of a solar minimum is a reduction of solar storms and another is the intensification of cosmic rays. The just ended solar cycle 24 turned out to be one of the weakest in more than a century – continuing a weakening trend that began in the 1980’s – and, if the latest forecasts are correct, the next solar cycle will be the weakest in more than 200 years.

One of the natural impacts of decreasing solar activity is the weakening of the ambient solar wind and its magnetic field which, in turn, allows more and more cosmic rays to penetrate the solar system. Galactic cosmic rays are high-energy particles originating from outside the solar system that can impact the Earth’s atmosphere. Our first line of defense from cosmic rays comes from the sun as its magnetic field and the solar wind combine to create a ‘shield’ that fends off cosmic rays attempting to enter the solar system. The shielding action of the sun is strongest during solar maximum and weakest during solar minimum with the weakening magnetic field and solar wind. The intensity of cosmic rays varies globally by about 15% over a solar cycle because of changes in the strength of the solar wind, which carries a weak magnetic field into the heliosphere, partially shielding Earth from low-energy galactic charged particles.

NEWLY PUBLISHED SCIENTIFIC PAPER TEARS GLOBAL WARMING AND THE IPCC TO SHREDS
Electro verse.net ^ | Dec 11, 2019

Posted on 12/17/2019, 4:54:46 PM by 11th_VA

http://www.freerepublic/com/focus/f-news/3801618/posts

A scientific paper entitled “An Overview of Scientific Debate of Global Warming and Climate Change” has recently come out of the University of Karachi, Pakistan. The paper’s author, Prof. Shamshad Akhtar delves into earth’s natural temperature variations of the past 1000 years, and concludes that any modern warming trend has been hijacked by political & environmental agendas, and that the science (tackled below) has been long-ignored and at times deliberately manipulated.

... Pro human induced global warming scientists exaggerate the contribution of carbon dioxide as a major greenhouse gas in absorbing long wave earth’s radiation. The fact is water vapor is the single largest atmospheric greenhouse gas (2% by volume), Carbon dioxide is second (0.0385% by volume).

Water vapor contributes 95% to the greenhouse effect, all other greenhouse gases combined contribute only 5%. Furthermore, the man-made portion of carbon dioxide contributes only 0.117% to the greenhouse effect.

The IPCC does not consider water vapor a greenhouse gas in its reports.

In addition, water vapor absorbs in a much wider band of long wave radiation (4-8 micrometer and 12-70 micrometer bands), whereas Carbon dioxide absorbs in narrow bands (13-16 micrometer) and ozone absorbs in a much smaller narrow band (9-10 micrometer). Thus, water vapor absorbs in a much wider wave length band, it has the single largest greenhouse effect among all the greenhouse gases


33 posted on 01/19/2020 11:52:34 AM PST by mosesdapoet (mosesdapoet aka L,J,Keslin posting here for the record hoping somebody might read and pass around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson