Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Iowa caucus rules could spark clashing claims of victory
AP ^ | January 16, 2020 | Alexandra Jaffe

Posted on 01/16/2020 6:31:11 AM PST by C19fan

The Iowa caucuses are never simple. Voters spend hours in high school gymnasiums or public libraries, starting their night by declaring support for their preferred presidential candidate. That’s followed by a feverish round of lobbying in which supporters of eliminated candidates are pressed to make a new pick by the evening’s end.

This year, the caucuses could be even more chaotic.

New rules that will be implemented for the Feb. 3 contest could give presidential candidates an unprecedented opportunity to spin the results. In previous years, the Iowa Democratic Party reported just one number: the number of state delegates won by each candidate. For the first time, the party will this year report two other numbers — who had the most votes at the beginning and at the end of the night.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: 2020; potus
What a weird system history and tradition has created for selecting presidential candidates.
1 posted on 01/16/2020 6:31:11 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Didn’t used to be this way.

Candidates were chosen at the conventions. There were no primaries or caucuses................


2 posted on 01/16/2020 6:53:00 AM PST by Red Badger (Against stupidity the gods themselves contend in vain.......... ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“The additional data is a nod to Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and his supporters, who argue the previous rules essentially robbed him of victory in his 2016 race against Hillary Clinton. That contest ended in a narrow delegate victory for Clinton in Iowa.”

Ironic that Hillary would then make an identical complaint about the general election: That she was “robbed” of her victory because we followed the rules.


3 posted on 01/16/2020 6:57:25 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Even if they were to choose by playing pin the tail on the donkey, who cares.


4 posted on 01/16/2020 7:01:55 AM PST by Jakarta ex-pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Th Iowa caucuses are perhaps the most democratic institution in selecting representatives to the state conventions. Instead of having local or state party hacks choose delegates, the local cItizens debate and then choose them. It’s true that at these small meetings, a few well-organized individuals can sway the opinions of the majority, but that’s far better than these winner-take-all state primaries that are controlled by state and national party leaders and big money donors.


5 posted on 01/16/2020 8:08:47 AM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Just vote and get it over with.


6 posted on 01/16/2020 8:16:40 AM PST by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Iowa caucuses have only been around since the ‘70s. Primaries haven’t been binding until even more recently. In 1968, Humphrey entered no primaries and got the nomination.

Candidates were always chosen by power brokers.


7 posted on 01/16/2020 8:31:47 AM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Iowa Caucus has been around since the 1800s. It was Jimmy Carter in 1976 who turned it into what it is today.


8 posted on 01/16/2020 8:34:03 AM PST by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

It wasn’t until the ‘70s that caucuses had anything to do with presidential nominations, originally they were just party organizational meetings. They still are in Iowa, with presidential preference added on.

How else do states pick party officials?


9 posted on 01/16/2020 8:40:54 AM PST by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jakarta ex-pat

“Even if they were to choose by playing pin the tail on the donkey, who cares.”

LOL, really. It’s a moot point. They’re toast no matter who they choose.


10 posted on 01/16/2020 3:48:53 PM PST by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson