Skip to comments.
Impeachment vote NOW
various ^
| 12/18/19
| Self
Posted on 12/18/2019 5:38:55 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants
Voting now
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: braking; couppeachment; impeachment; impeachmentvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Blood of Tyrants
41
posted on
12/18/2019 5:53:26 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: TexasGurl24
To: struggle
43
posted on
12/18/2019 5:54:31 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: dfwgator
No one said they love Gabbard. I dont. Just pointed out what the vote was.
To: Blood of Tyrants
There were resolutions presented “to reconsider” the articles. Set for debate tomorrow morning.
45
posted on
12/18/2019 5:54:51 PM PST
by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: TexasGurl24
I’ve seen a few comments here praising her.
46
posted on
12/18/2019 5:56:20 PM PST
by
dfwgator
(Endut! Hoch Hech!)
To: dontreadthis
“whos the R who voted yes on Article I?”
One Republican voted yes, then realized the mistake and voted no. I have seen this on C-Span before on other votes so it happens.
To: dfwgator
Big deal. Impeachment doesnt mean anything now, its almost a badge of honor.
It’s kind of like the inverse of the Nobel Prize.
48
posted on
12/18/2019 5:57:33 PM PST
by
hanamizu
To: Blood of Tyrants
he two articles of impeachment passed as follows (numbers will update as results come in):
Article 1: Abuse of Power: 230 YEA vs 197 NAY vs 1 PRESENT
Two Democrats Petersen and Van Drew voted NAY on Abuse of Power while one believed to be Presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard simply voted Present a form of abstention.
Article 2: Obstruction of Congress: 229 YEA vs 198 NAY vs 1 PRESENT
Three Democrats Petersen, Van Drew, and Golden voted No on Obstruction of Congress. Tulsi Gabbard voted Present.
49
posted on
12/18/2019 5:58:19 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
They will now attempt to tar him with it and completely paper over the illegitimacy of it.
50
posted on
12/18/2019 6:12:25 PM PST
by
headstamp 2
(There's a stairway to heaven, but there's a highway to hell.)
To: dontreadthis
Might not be an R, might be the backstabbing, prick Justin Amash, who is really an Independent.
To: Blood of Tyrants
Anyone who votes “present” today should not hold office. Means that they can’t make up their mind when the truth stares them in the face. They are not to be trusted. EVER.
To: 1_Rain_Drop
The one who voted present is not seeking re-election. Tulsi Gabbard is running for president.
53
posted on
12/18/2019 6:23:59 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
"The one who voted present is not seeking re-election. Tulsi Gabbard is running for president."Will that improve her resume? She'll be voting "present" when president? No backbone in my book.
I wasn't aware that she was running, or didn't pay attention, or didn't care...there are just too many nuts to keep track of them. All I'm aware of is many names start with a "B", it's like watching a B movie.
To: hanamizu
“To be Dispised by the
Dispicable”,,,
.
My tag line.
55
posted on
12/18/2019 6:48:51 PM PST
by
Big Red Badger
(Despised by the Despicable!)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Wow, you have an appropriate screen name foe tonighte.
56
posted on
12/18/2019 7:28:32 PM PST
by
cowboyusa
(America Cowboy Up)
To: Blood of Tyrants
Dear Lord I hope the Democrats get everything they have coming to them. And more.
57
posted on
12/18/2019 8:17:19 PM PST
by
Hoosier-Daddy
("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
To: Hoosier-Daddy
Dear Lord I hope the Democrats get everything they have coming to them. And more.
Theres the old saying the only thing worse than not getting what you want is getting what you want.
58
posted on
12/18/2019 8:34:55 PM PST
by
Flick Lives
(MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
To: Blood of Tyrants
59
posted on
12/19/2019 7:20:07 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(We can be called a racist and we'll just smile. Because we don't care.)
To: 1_Rain_Drop
She is so far down in the polls that she may as well not be running.
60
posted on
12/19/2019 7:28:46 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Everyone who favors socialism plans on the government taking other people's money, not theirs.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson