___________
The lovely couple never fight over anything but the last piece of cake.
Posted on 12/17/2019 8:20:15 AM PST by jazusamo
Arkanicide?
“...Nervous breakdown?
Here it comes......Here it comes....”
Perhaps the Grim Reaper is finally “swinging the sickle” tonight and snatching the hate-filled, evil soul of that vile POS and carrying it back to its home in hell from whence it came.
Either his wife is close to death...
or it is a bull sh** story made up as they are famous for doing...
Heard nothing on the news...so what is REALLY going on with these FRAUDS..?
Another Ruth Bader Ginsburg??? keep it secret...but DJT goes to Walter Reed for blood test as an annual event...and they had him suffering a coronary.
They are just simply AMAZING...
“The Senate is meant to act as judge and jury, to hear a trial, not to re-run the entire fact-finding investigation because angry partisans rushed sloppily through it,”
Succinct and to-the-point.
“.. both sides must be given a chance to present.”
Ideally, yes. That would be fair.
But there is already a conflict regarding what constitutes “being given a chance to present”.
House Democrats requested several White House witnesses who declined to appear before the House Committee hearings. Schumer’s position is that the Democrats should have a chance to present these witnesses in the Senate, to restore fairness.
McConnell is saying that the proper way to settle the question of whether these witnesses should be required to appear, was to appeal to the courts, which the House Democrats did not do. Therefore, according to McConnell, and presumably the White House, the Democrats already had their chance at due process with these witnesses, and the Senate is not obligated to give them another bite at the apple.
Actually, the conflict is even deeper than that. The reason the Democrats declined to follow due process and appeal to the courts is because doing so would have totally undercut their “obstruction of congress”’ claim.
After all, if the courts had upheld the White House’s right to refuse cooperation, there would have been no obstruction case because the courts deemed it valid. If the courts had struck it down, and forced them to testify - then by testifying, the obstruction claim would have been mitigated - either way, no obstruction! So the Democrats couldn’t appeal to the courts without destroying their own argument.
Basically, the Democrats have put themselves in queen’s check, and McConnell is not letting them take back their move.
________
Not optimal at all.
/s
___________
The lovely couple never fight over anything but the last piece of cake.
“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, OR to destroy by force the Government of the United States......SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY”
Exactly what the President has said this is
“A FRIVOLOUS impeachment vote is a SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY”
The Senate shouldn’t even take it up. Ignore it. What are the Dems gonna do? stamp their feet?
McConnell should throw a press conference..with a big trashcan present to throw the “articles” of impeachment into it
You could say, for whales and you would not be wrong
Dear Moron Democrats
You suppose to do the Investigation in the US House before making such a stupendous decision to impeach a duly elected President
You don’t get a do over in the US Senate because you clown show in the US House was a fraud and a farce.
“‘NADLER’ HAS AN MEDICAL EMERGENCY????”
Get me 50cc of KFC gravy in a hypo. Stat!
Jerry Nadler’s constant lies will probably send him the way of Elijah Cummings.
Same for Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff. These people know they are purposely lying and putting 300+ million of us at risk.
And they lie repeatedly, multiple times per day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.