[Morgana]

MORE WINNING!

[Gene Eric]

>> but abortion clinics normally don’t let women see their baby because they may change their mind after seeing their child.

Evil

[albie]

A friend of mine works for an organization that offers counseling and ultra sound pictures of your baby if you’re considering an abortion.

Literally 70% of these women decide against abortion when allowed to see the xray. PP is waaaay against this practice for just that reason.

[unixfox]

No mention on how they voted. But I can bet the usual suspects were against it.

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting Morgana. life BUMP

[Da Coyote]

“...but abortion clinics normally don’t let women see their baby because they may change their mind after seeing their child. “

Need anything more be said about the complete slimes in the ACLU?
Following CW-II, I trust that very very special punishments will be given to these vermin.

[immadashell]

… attorneys from the ACLU, maintained that HB 2 forces abortionists to “deliver ‘ideological’ messages to their patients, even when it’s against a patient’s wishes,” a violating of the abortionist’s’ First Amendment rights.

What perverted mind came up with this flawed logic?

[Cedar]

Thank God!!

[jeffc]

Judge Hale wrote, ... “However, HB 2 does not advance those interests and impermissibly interferes with physicians’ First Amendment rights.”

What about the patient's FA rights? I guess the "judge" is more interested in furthering Leftist beliefs that adhering to the Constitution.

I'm still confused how the physician's FA rights fit into all this...

[Revel]

“The Supreme Court has upheld a Kentucky law slowing women a chance to see an ultrasound of their unborn baby before having an abortion.”

They need a new editor. I have no idea what they are trying to say.

[I want the USA back]

Who challenged it? man-hating feminazis who love abortion? They will do anything to protect their sacrament. Disgusting.

[Rushmore Rocks]

Thanks for all your efforts on the pro life sites, much appreciated.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

🕊🧸

[The Pack Knight]

So being “pro-choice” means denying a woman the choice to see an ultrasound before her abortion. And a doctor has a First Amendment right to withhold information from a patient before having them consent to a surgical procedure. Right.

I am convinced we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the abortion movement.

[grey_whiskers]

Remember, the right to choose involves a woman’s body, and is a purely private decision.

That’s why according to the abortionists, the government must pay for it and the woman can’t see an ultrasound of the area before the abortion.

and 1 + 1 = sqrt(-1 * pi)

[blueyon]

Praise God for the SCOTUS upholding ultrasounds as this simple step to opening eyes to what abortion is

[Kickass Conservative]

Letting? How about making it mandatory?

[ChildOfThe60s]

I’m glad this was done while Bevin was still governor.
There is no way Beshear would have appealed it. He’s another baby killer. In addition to being corrupt.

I am so grateful that we elected an ethical, conservative AG. He will limit some of the corrupt crap that would have occurred with Stumbo as AG covering Beshear’s butt.

[CivilWarBrewing]

I’m sure the great “CATHOLIC” Nancy Pelosi will be ecstatic over this news. /s

[fwdude]

So, Planned Parenthood is against full disclosure of information to the woman?

[albie]

“A friend of mine works for an organization that offers counseling and ultra sound pictures of your baby if you’re considering an abortion.

Literally 70% of these women decide against abortion when allowed to see the xray. PP is waaaay against this practice for just that reason.”

...UPDATE. It’s 80%. Just talked to my friend.