Supreme Court Upholds Kentucky Law Letting Women See Ultrasound of Their Baby Before Abortion

LIFE NEWS ^ | Dec, 9, 2019 | Steven Ertelt

[Morgana]

MORE WINNING!

[Gene Eric]

>> but abortion clinics normally don’t let women see their baby because they may change their mind after seeing their child.

Evil

[albie]

A friend of mine works for an organization that offers counseling and ultra sound pictures of your baby if you’re considering an abortion.

Literally 70% of these women decide against abortion when allowed to see the xray. PP is waaaay against this practice for just that reason.

[unixfox]

No mention on how they voted. But I can bet the usual suspects were against it.

[PGalt]

Thanks for posting Morgana. life BUMP

[Da Coyote]

“...but abortion clinics normally don’t let women see their baby because they may change their mind after seeing their child. “

Need anything more be said about the complete slimes in the ACLU?
Following CW-II, I trust that very very special punishments will be given to these vermin.

[immadashell]

… attorneys from the ACLU, maintained that HB 2 forces abortionists to “deliver ‘ideological’ messages to their patients, even when it’s against a patient’s wishes,” a violating of the abortionist’s’ First Amendment rights.

What perverted mind came up with this flawed logic?

[gibsonguy]

“clinics normally don’t let women see their baby “

Think about that sentence, especially the use of the word “let”.

[Cedar]

Thank God!!

[jeffc]

Judge Hale wrote, ... “However, HB 2 does not advance those interests and impermissibly interferes with physicians’ First Amendment rights.”

What about the patient's FA rights? I guess the "judge" is more interested in furthering Leftist beliefs that adhering to the Constitution.

I'm still confused how the physician's FA rights fit into all this...

[Revel]

“The Supreme Court has upheld a Kentucky law slowing women a chance to see an ultrasound of their unborn baby before having an abortion.”

They need a new editor. I have no idea what they are trying to say.

[ducttape45]

Umm, the devil perhaps?

[silverleaf]

Imagine wanting to prevent up to 70% of women from participating in a medical procedure

Imagine being so opposed to life you forbid women from making that choice!

Millions of children

[milagro]

AMEN!!!

[I want the USA back]

Who challenged it? man-hating feminazis who love abortion? They will do anything to protect their sacrament. Disgusting.

[Rushmore Rocks]

Thanks for all your efforts on the pro life sites, much appreciated.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Literally 70% of these women decide against abortion when allowed to see the xray.

We are a visually oriented species. What we can see becomes "real". When you see that little heart beating it moves from "pregnancy" to "baby".

You can end a pregnancy, killing your baby is a totally different thing.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Who challenged it? man-hating feminazis who love abortion?

Equally likely to be men who don't want to support their children.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

🕊🧸

[The Pack Knight]

So being “pro-choice” means denying a woman the choice to see an ultrasound before her abortion. And a doctor has a First Amendment right to withhold information from a patient before having them consent to a surgical procedure. Right.

I am convinced we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the abortion movement.