Posted on 12/09/2019 5:47:55 AM PST by Kaslin
We often hear about inmates on death row who are exonerated after years behind bars, usually because the prosecution made procedural errors, or there wasn’t any DNA evidence to convincingly prove the person committed the crime. But what if it was made clear at the trial that someone else committed the murder, not the guy sentenced to death row?
Patrick Bearup has been sitting behind bars for almost 17 years, sentenced to death for a murder he did not commit. He fell in with some bad people in his 20s. They told him to accompany them to the house of Mark Mathes, who his roommate Jessica Nelson said had stolen $200 from her. Nelson set up the visit. They told the owners of the house, the brother and sister-in-law of Mathes, that they were going to confront him. The brother asked them to get his ring back, which Mathes was wearing. Jeremy Johnson carried a baseball bat over there. Sean Gaines carried a shotgun. Bearup, the son of a police officer, was terrified, he thought they were going to kill him; he only had his folding knife on him, which he regularly carried. Instead, Johnson beat Mathes to death with his baseball bat.
After Mathes was murdered, Nelson tried to cut the ring off his finger. She was having difficulty, so Bearup helped her and used wire cutters to cut the ring to get it off. They never reported the murder, and Mathes’s body was not discovered until a year later.
After they were caught, the prosecution offered plea bargains to Johnson, Nelson and Gaines. Johnson, the killer, accepted a deal of 14 years in prison. He is now out. Nelson accepted the same deal and is also now out. Gaines took a plea deal of 25 years; it was longer since he had a criminal history. He is still serving that term.
The prosecution did not offer Bearup a plea bargain. They claimed that Bearup had cut Mathes’s finger off, not the ring — but the body had decomposed after a year so they produced no evidence of this. However, both Johnson and Nelson testified that Bearup did not kill Mathes. They also said he wasn’t one of them; they didn’t like him because he was a cop’s kid. Bearup was convicted of felony-murder by a jury and given the death penalty.
Why wasn’t Bearup given a plea bargain like the others? The Bearups think it is because his father, Tom Bearup, ran against the county sheriff for office. They think the sheriff and county attorney retaliated against them.
Judge Warren Granville, a former prosecutor, was so horrified he wrote in his opinion that justice was not served in this case. He said Bearup’s behavior did not rise to the level of a capital punishment crime. He said even if Bearup had cut Mathes’s finger off, he still didn’t kill Mathes. Mathes’s brother tellingly had the ring repaired.
Bearup had two-week old twins when he was arrested. They have grown up without him. Meanwhile, he has been an exemplary prisoner. He has not gotten into trouble. He has obtained advanced degrees in prison, and is currently working on his PhD (which he paid for himself, not the taxpayers). When he was told by a woman on the staff to stop holding Bible studies, he sued and won the right to have them. He makes stuffed animals from prison T-shirts and sells them to raise funds. Some of them are decked out as Trump supporters. The staff tells his family that he is a wonderful guy, not the type you’d find on death row.
Bearup is still going through the appeals process. It takes on average of 20 years for inmates on death row to go through the process and get exonerated. He is also trying to get a pardon. Since it’s a state crime, President Trump probably can’t pardon him. But the governor of Arizona, Doug Ducey, can commute his sentence. Bearup has also asked for clemency from the state clemency board. Nancy Barto, a respected Republican state legislator, provided a letter to the board on Bearup’s behalf. Unfortunately, they did not grant it.
His father asks, “Why do they want to kill someone who didn’t kill someone? While they let the real murderer out on the street? I’m as pro-death penalty as they come. If he had murdered someone I would not be defending him.” Bearup is now 42. His father says all he wants is for his son to come home before he dies.
I am very skeptical of inmates on death row who are “exonerated,” because usually it’s not because they were actually innocent. This isn’t one of those cases. It’s black and white that Bearup did not commit the murder. Hopefully, he will receive justice through the appeal or Governor Ducey will commute his sentence.
I’m skeptical. I’m thinking there might be more to the story.
If true as the story reads, he probably doesn’t deserve the death penalty and maybe 17 years counts as time served. He was still an accessory and did take a part by mutilating the corpse and assumedly helping to hide the body, not to mention not turning in his co-conspirators. Maybe the courts add another few to take it to an even 20.
Interesting case.
Schiff happens.
Dindu Nuffin
Excellent summary of the Defense case.
Where can I read the Prosecution case?
Thanks.
A murder committed involves all in the group. Be careful of whom you associate with.
He participated in the murder. He was part of a felony that resulted in the murder. The hell with him.
“Where can I read the Prosecution case?”
You obviously don’t understand how this works. You read the one sided story, have an immediate emotional reaction, and post a reply. Further thought process beyond that is neither required or desired.
Everything said, our justice system is still a disgrace; you can be prosecuted mercilessly for crimes you did not commit, because of your political affiliation; or the need for the prosecutors to show commitment to “social justice”.
And innocent men are indeed convicted, and given long sentences.
The mythical “give me my day in court!” rings hollow today...
Seems like he was properly convicted of murder under the felony murder rule. Based on his own admissions, he participated in a robbery that resulted in the victim’s death.
Maybe it isn’t fair that the other guys got plea bargains, and maybe a death sentence is excessive, but I don’t see how anyone is supposed to be “exonerated” here.
Seems like he was properly convicted of murder under the felony murder rule. Based on his own admissions, he participated in a robbery that resulted in the victim’s death.
Maybe it isn’t fair that the other guys got plea bargains, and maybe a death sentence is excessive, but I don’t see how anyone is supposed to be “exonerated” here.
Exactly.
Felony murder. Having read this I don’t have too much sympathy for him.
Plea deals do this thing often.
Where a driver is given more time than the shooter because the shooter cut a deal first.
Felony murder rule. If someone dies when you took part in the crime, legal consequence is the same as if you had done the deed yourself.
You don’t actually need to pull the trigger to land on death row. If the antecedent crime is itself a felony, that’s all that sufficient.
Don’t do the crime, stupid.
The scandal isn’t that he got the death penalty, but that the others were able to avoid it.
I am skeptical too. I am for reform and forgiveness, but just not for any sob story.
I...don’t actually see the problem here.
He participated in a murder, mutilated the body, no indication of attempt to stop or report the incident.
All participants should get what he got; that they didn’t (by working the broken system) doesn’t mean he should get off too.
Per well-established “felony murder” law, yes he did commit a murder - as part of a group intending to do so.
Part of the point of “felony murder” law is deterrent: yes, the state may very well execute you for knowingly participating in a group which, as a whole, murders - don’t. (Yes he was terrified of opposing the group. If he had, reason to believe the victim would have survived.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.