Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/08/2019 8:50:24 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: george76

There is no place more dangerous than a “gun free zone”.

Then you _know_ everyone who has a gun is a bad guy.


2 posted on 12/08/2019 8:52:15 AM PST by cgbg (The Democratic Party is morphing into the Donner Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

NSS

(To the headline writer, not you George)


3 posted on 12/08/2019 9:02:07 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I could be mistaken but I believe the sailor who shot the civilians was on duty and used issued weapons.


4 posted on 12/08/2019 9:02:22 AM PST by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

It should also raise some doubts about letting Muslims into our Nation, especially to train them in military matters.


7 posted on 12/08/2019 9:04:22 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
After the deranged Psychologist Army Major Nidal Hasan shootings and the Chattanooga, TN recruiting office shootings, The DoD authorized base commanders to allow the carry of personally owned firearms by DoD personnel.

It is the base commander that has prohibited concealed carry on base, not DoD policy.

DOD DIRECTIVE 5210.56 ARMING AND THE USE OF FORCE

SECTION 4: POSSESSION OF PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS BY DOD
PERSONNEL NOT RELATED TO THE PERFORMANCE OF OFFICIAL DUTIES.

4.1. GENERAL. This section provides guidance for determining the eligibility of DoD personnel to carry privately owned firearms on DoD property for personal protection when it is not related to the performance of official duties. This section also provides requirements for individual training, transport, safeguarding, and storage of privately owned firearms that the arming authority must consider when determining whether to permit an individual to carry a privately owned firearm on DoD property.

4.2. ARMING AUTHORITIES CHARGED WITH PERMITTING PERSONS TO CARRY PRIVATELY OWNED FIREARMS. The arming authorities charged with determining whether to permit DoD personnel to carry privately owned firearms on DoD property:

a. May grant permission to DoD personnel requesting to carry a privately owned firearm (concealed or open carry) on DoD property for a personal protection purpose not related to performance of an official duty or status. Permissions granted under this section do not apply to carrying a firearm within federal buildings unless the arming authority specifically determines, after consultation with servicing legal counsel and in accordance with applicable DoD policy, that an appropriate exception under Section 930(d) of Title 18, U.S.C. applies.

8 posted on 12/08/2019 9:05:00 AM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

#VictimZone


9 posted on 12/08/2019 9:06:10 AM PST by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

That should have been changed when the first shooting occured years ago!


11 posted on 12/08/2019 9:13:24 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

PDJT is commander in chief. This edict is about 3 or 4 sentences at most. Why isn’t it done?


12 posted on 12/08/2019 9:15:05 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Vote for President Trump in 2020 or end up equally miserable, no rights, and eating zoo animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Government-issued firearms are locked in an arms room on base and only distributed when they are needed for training

The Pearl Harbor shooter was issued one of these guns.

13 posted on 12/08/2019 9:16:54 AM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Read my tag line.
14 posted on 12/08/2019 9:18:49 AM PST by immadashell (Save Innocent Lives - ban gun free zones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

What use is a military without weapons they may employ?


15 posted on 12/08/2019 9:18:50 AM PST by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Time to question why we think selling weapons is so important we have to take these risks.

10 Saudis now in custody over the attack they won’t call terrorism.

Even under Trump the idiocy continues.


16 posted on 12/08/2019 9:22:48 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (The internet has driven the world mad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Not all base commanders are willing to make that exception, and it is considered on a very strict case-by-case basis, according to experts.

I would say that no base commanders are willing to make that exception as a means of CYA for them. Even if a shooting occurred by someone not granted such an exception, the commander could kiss his career goodby for "permitting an environment that encouraged access to firearms".

18 posted on 12/08/2019 9:49:54 AM PST by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

When I was in the Army,I knew many fellow soldiers who owned firearms (and carried). Secondly,I can’t see any possible way outside of absolute gross dereliction by the Arms Room that a service weapon is used as a murder weapon. I was always in Infantry so maybe the rest of the services and branches are different.


19 posted on 12/08/2019 10:10:20 AM PST by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

I work on a military base.

If a civilian Army/Navy/AF employee with a TS + clearance brings a gun onto a base and gets caught, they will be fired by COB. Even if it’s a accident of leaving one in the vehicle from the weekend. Only exception is the long PITA process to hunt on base if available.
Bring one into the building and my guess is fired with charges filed. Federal felony charges.

I want to post signs outside the local base saying :

All women entering or exiting this base are unarmed without even mace or a pocket knife. Please do not rape, rob, kidnap, murder or attack these women as they run errands after work - by order of Base Commander and the US Army.


20 posted on 12/08/2019 10:23:15 AM PST by wgmalabama (Mittens is the new Juan. Go away mittens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Part of the solution must be the soldiers paying closer attention to their fellow soldiers.


21 posted on 12/08/2019 10:37:03 AM PST by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They’re “questioning the ban on military bases”?! So first they need to research this?!


25 posted on 12/08/2019 11:43:25 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Senior NCO’s and Officers should be armed at all military bases.

The president could order this today.


26 posted on 12/08/2019 11:47:23 AM PST by Kozak (DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The Pearl Harbor incident involved an armed security guard shooting people using the weapon he was assigned. If that isn’t a one-off, nothing is. There is simply no comparison between the two incidents, and the Pearl Harbor one is totally unique.


28 posted on 12/08/2019 11:59:09 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Trained to use firearms, then stripped of the right to self-defense.

It’s a Bonehead policy. Whoever started that crap should rot.


29 posted on 12/08/2019 12:06:06 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson