Posted on 12/05/2019 7:54:16 PM PST by Kevin in California
I strongly suggest being very skeptical of anything being labeled ‘America First’ until you know it has nothing to do with racist, anti semite, maggot Nick Fuentes. I was very surprised and disappointed that Michelle malkin would chose to throw away any credilbility by recently supporting this POS. And Malkin’s name is mentioned on the page when I clicked to it so I presume this article is connected to the America First trolls who will greatly harm the conservative movement if left unchecked. Please watch these clips from Nick Fuentes and his America First ‘sabotage’ podcast if you wonder where I am coming from.
I’m in Texas, and just received a donation request letter from Elise.
I will send this info about her record to her, questioning why, as my “donation”.
Thanks.
I believe she was upset about Trump pulling out of paris accord , and thinks man is causing climate change-
Yup:
“A New York Republican is speaking out against President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate accord.”
“Stefanik”, eh? Sounds foreign. We need to get a look at this chick’s birth certificate, stat.
Grow up. There is no one in any party that is pure. There are always issues that will bring disagreement. Purity will cause a permanent minority party status.
There are people here on this site who proudly did not vote for their republican candidate in 2018 because they weren't pure. It was an easy call to know that if the House flipped in 2018, Trump would get impeached. A very easy call. Still, that did not move them one bit. I would rather have a person voting with us 75% of the time as opposed to 0%. That however is not good enough - so they will gladly take 0% and impeachment as opposed to voting with Trump most of the time and no impeachment.
The immaturity level astonishes me of those that will take their ball and go home if the republican candidate is not 100% pure.
No party has ever been pure and no party will ever be pure.
Hear hear. It would be nice if they would turn that vitriol towards the crummie scum but there are some on here that seem fine with the Dems but are out to get any public that stays in any way.
I’m in Texas, and just received a donation request letter from Elise.
I will send this info about her record to her, questioning why, as my “donation”.
Thanks.
____________________________\
Excellent idea...
I got a request...will do the same :)
Seriously?
And what names don’t sound foreign?
DAPA which attempted to follow DACA was stopped by federal court injunction brought originally by a couple of Freepers one of whom is me. Governor Abbott tasked the Texas AG to sue Obama and his DAPA in federal court. DAPA was eventually dropped by DOJ under the Trump Administration.
The answer to your question regarding illegal parents is found in the Trump Administration policy as to the CLEANUP. It’s all right there.
I live in her district. I voted for her when she first ran against Bill Owens and was glad that she was elected. Soon after that she became a tool of the establishment. She was voting with John Boehner and his leadership team every time. I wrote to her office and told her that we had not elected her to just be a rubber stamp and that I would not support her again. Since, I have not darkened her circle in the voting booth and will not until I can be sure that she is truly Pro-American. I’m watching her. Her latest performance is promising but, I’ll wait and see.
From http://www.americanlastnames.us
Last Name STEFANIK
Summary/Contribute
Meaning Not available
Origin Polish, Slovakian, Hungarian
Rank 17,577 (2000 US census)
21,211 (1990 US census)
Count 1,475 (2000 US census)
Race / ethnic distribution
The 2000 US Census claims that 97.42%, or 1437 total occurrences, of those with this family name identified themselves as being white,
undisclosed % as black,
undisclosed % as Asian and Pacific Islander,
undisclosed % as American Indian and Native Alaskan,
0.75%, or 11 total occurrences, as two or more races, and
1.36%, or 20 total occurrences, as Hispanic ethnic origin.
She seems to support trump right now and that matters. Since she’s in minority in congress not much she can do anyway.
Hear hear!!!!
The current issue is not immigration. The current issue is about not negating the votes of 62,984,828 of Americans in 2016. If she’s on board with that, then for now I’m happy to have her on our side. The other crap can wait until later.
“When we were fighting the Axis we didn’t spend all our time mindlessly whining about what a bastard Stalin was.”
Like when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Great speech.
The current issue is not immigration. The current issue is about not negating the votes of 62,984,828 of Americans in 2016. If she’s on board with that, then for now I’m happy to have her on our side. The other crap can wait until later.
————-
Oh I agree with you. Piling on the negatives about our own party members is why our party is so fractured, splintered and the rats are so tight. We will not win if there’s splintering on this coup. Hopefully as things play out and the rats are exposed can turn some people around and understand the errs of their way.
I am sick of people trashing others just because they don’t agree with them 100%.
Grow up. There is no one in any party that is pure. There are always issues that will bring disagreement. Purity will cause a permanent minority party status.
There are people here on this site who proudly did not vote for their republican candidate in 2018 because they weren’t pure. It was an easy call to know that if the House flipped in 2018, Trump would get impeached. A very easy call. Still, that did not move them one bit. I would rather have a person voting with us 75% of the time as opposed to 0%. That however is not good enough - so they will gladly take 0% and impeachment as opposed to voting with Trump most of the time and no impeachment.
The immaturity level astonishes me of those that will take their ball and go home if the republican candidate is not 100% pure.
No party has ever been pure and no party will ever be pure.
Are you supportive of Mueller and his police state tactics? The GOP is. Are supportive of those aiding and abetting the coup? The GOP is. Are you supportive of a GOP POTUS under coupist assault having his own AG? DNI? The GOP is not. Etc., etc.
Feel free to vote for those who do not support and defend you post Trump. I won’t be. Your “purity” kapo routine will get exactly zero votes from those having a shred of self respect. Stay on the progressive-corporist GOP plantation if you wish. I won’t be. Signed, life long GOP party ticket voter. (That includes McCain and Hillary Criminal lover Pierre Romney, btw)
She’s from NY. She’s solid on Trump.
Whole lot of Stockholm Syndrome going on among the GOP uber alles crowd. Or maybe battered woman syndrome? The ugly truth is the GOP treats MAGA conservatives no better than the Dems treat blacks. Worse, actually, because the GOP lies about their true agenda. At least Dems deliver the government cheese for their constitutions. OTOH, the GOP has lied to the GOP base for 30 years about the border, immigration, unfair trade, etc.
Enough is enough in my book. The GOP supporting Mueller’s police state and the coup was the last straw for me. If I am going to live in a police state it will be without my vote supporting it. Thank you very much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.