Posted on 12/02/2019 11:08:35 PM PST by knighthawk
Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who claims she was trafficked by convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein and forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on three occasions nearly 20 years ago, has shared more details of her story in a shocking interview broadcast Monday.
Roberts, now 35, told BBC Panorama in a one-hour sitdown -- reportedly conducted before the broadcaster's interview with Andrew that aired Nov. 14 -- how she first met Epstein.
According to Roberts, she was working at Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate as a locker room attendant when she was recruited by Epstein's on-again, off-again girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, to give Epstein massages.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
All this royal scandal stuff is fine and all, but I want to hear one of these girls utter the words, “Bill Clinton”.
They’re smarter than that!
Epstein really was a lefty and evil dude, but come on!
Like many other royals, Prince Andrew has always suffered from severe moral turpitude.
But the timing and attempted connection here seems telling to me. A 35 year old British female waits till basically now, to say she was employed by Trump in Florida, as a British 15 year old girl, to work in a mens locker room... Really!
How many hurdles did that take?
Smells like another carefully thought out, WELL TIMED, “deep state” hit piece, designed to damage President Trump, and his NATO trip!
Similar to every other substantive foreign trip he takes, someone throws something out there to try and totally burry the importance of what he is actually doing!
Seriously, someone is once again trying to tie the globalist lefty pedofile Epstein to Trump, exactly when the Demon Party is trying to impeach Trump, and while he is again trying to actually get legitimate work done.
By itself, this is indicative of yet ongoing collaberative U.S. Deep State/FVEY/MULTIFORN (my classification) operations to take down President Trump.
By default, she is tagging Trump as a pedofile and fixer...
Man, where will these people stop!
Send the prince to the Tower!!
Off with his head!
Hang him in a cage over London Bridge!
“pedofile” = “pedophile”
Probably several more mistakes, as sent from phone -
If you played or know about the kevin bacon game this is the Donald trump game where the most obscure story filtered down through many stories always ends up leading to Donald trump.
Trump threw Epstein out of the club for something he did to one of his employees...was it her?
First, historically, royalty have never professed a great affinity for restraint in the realm of the sexual. The members of our own ruling class are merely more secretive.
There has not been a general tone of outrage over the number of people in white collar positions who have been arrested for possession of pedophile filth. I’m fairly experienced in the ways of the world, but I must admit that the constant news items concerning this issue has shocked me.
Second, at 15 or 16, (Ms. Giuffre’s alleged age with Prince Andrew) we’re no longer talking about pedophilia.
Remember: there is a leftist political movement in this country to legalize pedophiles as having a legitimate form of sexual orientation. This pedophilia repugnance in large swaths of the Swamp (journalist or politician) is nothing more than faux outrage and a political weapon to bring down those whom they choose for whatever reason. If that were not the case, why has Hollywood not been journalistically exposed?
Third, Ms. Giuffre claims to have had it “pretty rough” up till the time she was recruited by Maxwell. Maybe. That’s a relative phrase the subjectivity of which could render it effectively self-serving. Whether true or not, its inclusion is meant to stir the emotional heart strings of listeners and readers - particularly women. But I’ve met more than one woman with difficult childhoods (at least by their account) who had learned a dark worldliness and who were wizards at manipulation.
Why is that last point relevant? Because the one picture of her with Prince Andrew displays a very smiling young woman who seems to be enjoying herself. There are other pictures out there on the internet showing a bevy of very young women, presumably on Epstein’s island, who were smiling and laughing. If they were acting, give them an Oscar.
This looking back and claiming outrage at being taken advantage of by men is the general theme of the “Woke” nonsense. Many of these women (including of the Weinstein variety) were either genuinely enjoying themselves (especially a newly discovered “power” trip over men) or had decided it was acceptable to achieve whatever it was they wanted. Not a few live with guilt that is psychologically assuaged by claiming victimization.
So, Ms. Giuffre: a genuine victim or a manipulative Lolita? At this point, for me, the jury is still out.
Legally, underage girls cannot give consent. They may like what they are doing, but the law says the older person is guilty of rape.
At about age 15, that girl was old enough to know better. So while Andrew is getting the punishment he deserves, she should be out there urging young girls not to behave like she did, rather than holding herself out to be some sort of a hero-victim.
She’s American. She grew up in Florida.
Teenage girls are dumb and make dumb decisions. Its not right that a worldly adult takes advantage of their naivete that they will regret later.
Agree 100%.
Methinks there’s a bit of naivete out there concerning teenage girls. I’ve taught them. They’re not the teenage girls with whom I grew up. The publications they read and the generally anti-male feminist culture that has dominated this society for the last 50 years and that many of them have imbibed has had consequences. A great many young women have embraced the ultra-entitled feminist philosophy. Men are easy pickings in a society where the leftist and secular judiciary have even forced men who have disproved paternity through DNA to pay child support if they’ve been in a past relationship with a woman.
Yes, Prince Andrew is paying the price for being a part of the elite that he (along with the Swamp) thought made him and them invulnerable and immune to accountability. But I’m sick of the faux outrage of a leftist media that promotes every perversity imaginable and then claims horror at story such as this one.
Yes, Democrats have an unsurpassed talent for forcing the obvious into suppression.
I just have one question: was Giuffre free to come and go as she pleased? Or was she locked into whatever residence that Epstein wanted? If she was free to come and go AND the age of consent was/is16, why is she claiming being trafficked instead of just being a prostitute? IIRC, she did have a place to live with other perks.......
I do understand that Epstein was a criminal, but the age of consent in many of his ‘girls’ had been passed.NOT SUGGESTING THAT THOSE CHILDREN STUCK ON PEDOPHILE ISLAND WEREN’T CAPTIVE. Just wondering if this woman has a legitimate claim of being trafficked/ being FORCED to have sex with whomever Epstein put in her way.
Are you a troll?
If i recall the last three letters of a 4 letter word stand for - under command of the king
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.