Posted on 11/27/2019 5:50:30 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
WASHINGTON Critics of President Trump cheered on Monday when a federal judge ruled that the former White House counsel Donald F. McGahn II must testify to Congress and scathingly labeled fiction the administrations arguments that top White House aides are immune from congressional subpoenas.
Indeed, the outcome was the latest in a string of lower-court losses for Mr. Trump as he defends his stonewalling of lawmakers oversight and the impeachment investigation. Other fights are playing out in the courts over Mr. Trumps financial records and grand-jury evidence in the Russia investigation.
But from a realist perspective, Mr. Trump is winning despite losing.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
The Slimes failed to mention that the judges in question are all Osama Obama appointees.That’s what leftists do when they try to circumvent laws and make unconstitutional demands...they go to a judge appointed by Osama Obama,BillyBob or the Peanut Farmer.
Separation of Powers, stupid. Author should read the Constitution. We are a 3 branch government, but the Democratic House thinks they are God..
SCOTUS slaps them down: "Why, muh them right-wing radical bumpkin SCOTUS justices are in the pockets of Drumpf! Not fair!"
Partisan Media Shills update.
They sure like judges and appealling when they go to court to block lawfully passed laws they opposed.
when socialist lose, courts good.
when socialists win, its stonewalling.
i seriously wish cwii would just get going. i can still fight.
Opinion headliners aren’t news. Numerical analysis is news.
He loses these cases because the plaintiffs explicitly go Demorat judge-shopping. They don’t randomly choose jurisdictions.
The Bolshies are judge shopping, and, the Judges are vastly overstepping their authority, greatly, enhancing their chance of being overturned.
Talk about delusional: Trump keeps WINNING in court. Perhaps only on appeal, but only the final ruling matters.
He does not have to testify, he has to respond to the subpoena and show up. They they can stipulate Executive privileged and he does not have to say a damn thing.
I dont recall any losses. A single judge is not the final word
If obozo appointed these judges why can’t Trump unappoint them?
Correction. Mr Trump loses a number of lower court rulings. And then they get sent back or overruled by the Supremes.
Thats not the way it works
Yeah, he loses in LOWER courts.
How exactly did Trump “lose” to Judge Jumanji? She had to stay her OWN ruling to prevent the embarrassment of appellate slap-down.
What will the NYT do when Trump flips the Ninth Circus?
2. Please don’t confuse NYT reporting with facts and logic. Against their Ethics code about honest reporting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.