To: bkopto
suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices by federal agents at airports and other U.S. ports of entry are unconstitutional That's a terrific start, no kidding. Did they happen to mention suspicionless searches of travelers' crotches?
To: SamuraiScot
They’ll just always make sure to be suspicious now.
Suspicionless search == “random” search?
To: SamuraiScot
Obama District Court Judge, of course.
11 posted on
11/25/2019 1:44:51 PM PST by
House Atreides
(Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
To: SamuraiScot
"...suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices by federal agents at airports and other U.S. ports of entry are unconstitutional" Should be stated as:"Suspicionless searches of travelers’ electronic devices by federal agents at airports and other U.S. ports of entry are unconstitutional only if the "travelers" are U.S. citizens...
15 posted on
11/25/2019 2:05:52 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
To: SamuraiScot
Now do so with phones and traffic stops or other LEO activity outside of a court order.
45 posted on
11/25/2019 3:58:34 PM PST by
fuente
(Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
To: SamuraiScot
Did they happen to mention suspicionless searches of travelers' crotches? It depends. /S
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson