[ClearCase_guy]

They should call someone we haven’t heard from yet — like that Eric Ciaramella guy.

I can imagine Schiff’s response: “You can’t call him. He’s the whistleblower whose name I do not know.”

[CAGOPgramma]

HAHAHA😁🤣🤣😂😲😳

[kiryandil]

I can imagine Schiff’s response: “You can’t call him. He’s the whistleblower whose name I do not know.”

    

[SecAmndmt]

“I can imagine Schiff’s response: “You can’t call him. He’s the whistleblower whose name I do not know.”

LOL!

[Bob434]

I wish someone had gone into the hearings with a whistle in their hand and say “Is there an Eric Ciaramella in the room? Is there an Eric Ciaramella present here? I found a whistle laying in the hallway with your name on it. Eric Ciaramella, Are you in the house?”

[nutmeg]

ROTFL!

[Labyrinthos]

They should call someone we haven’t heard from yet — like that Eric Ciaramella guy. I can imagine Schiff’s response: “You can’t call him. He’s the whistleblower whose name I do not know.”

Here's what I don't get: There is nothing illegal about disclosing the name of the so-called whistle-blower, and even if it is illegal, the Constitution protects members of Congress from prosecution for statement made under the dome while conducting official business. If Jordon and the other GOP committee members had any balls, one of them would have asked each witness the following:

Are you familiar with the name Eric Ciaramella?

How are you familar?

Have you ever communicated directly or indirectly with Eric Ciaramella?

Have you ever communicated directly or indirectly with Eric Ciaramella concerning Ukraine?

Have you ever communicated directly or indirectly with Eric Ciaramella concerning POTUS Trump's July 25 telephone call with... etc.