Posted on 11/21/2019 2:28:43 AM PST by Libloather
The House impeachment hearings are scheduled to continue Thursday with the highly anticipated testimony from Fiona Hill, a former top National Security Council expert on Russia, and David Holmes, a State Department official.
Their scheduled appearances will follow Wednesday's marathon day of testimony, most notably from Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union, whose remarks raised eyebrows on both sides of the aisle.
Hill is among several witnesses who have testified behind closed doors. It is believed she played a central role in a July 10 meeting at the White House in which Sondland and Acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney allegedly told Ukrainian officials that President Trump would meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky -- if Zelensky would agree to investigate the Ukraine business dealings of former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden.
At that meeting, Hill said, former national security adviser John Bolton "immediately stiffened and ended the meeting."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
And in the meantime, President Trump has pulled up during the impeachment nonsense and is now leading all Democrats in the Marquette poll of the State of Wisconsin.
They’re batting .000.
Maybe the Pearl-Clutchers will finally unclutch:)
I can’t believe they’ve gone back to “quid pro quo”. It clearly didn’t happen. And it’s not a crime. What on earth is the point?
+100
How about some testimony from the Clinton Foundation thieves?
“No Country On Planet Earth Donated More Money to The Clinton Foundation Than Ukraine Did”
https://www.waynedupree.com/clinton-foundation-ukraine/
No Country On Planet Earth Donated More Money to The Clinton Foundation Than Ukraine Did”
https://www.waynedupree.com/clinton-foundation-ukraine/
...
Why hasn’t PDJT tweeted that ? Followed by, “why is that?” And, “why won’t the media do their job and investigate?”
I can’t believe they’ve gone back to “quid pro quo”. It clearly didn’t happen. And it’s not a crime. What on earth is the point?
Did you see the debate last night? That’s the point.
Three hours hate.
TOTAL FARCE ALL OF IT Americans know who the real criminals are they are the ones running this investigation
This was in the WSJ in the comments section....a Ukrainian pub.
https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/press-conference/625876.html
I know right? Tape released, nothing there. So then, they went to hearsay. That didn’t work not strong enough. So then they went to “over heard President on phone who was talking to someone else” because that person held the phone out from his ear so “he heard” in a restaurant what the President was saying.
Insane.
To damage the President any way possible. But I think you know that. They’re still ticked off he won 2016 and know they can’t win 2020.
“””What on earth is the point?”””
Fiona Hill also mentioned.
You nailed it!
“”””””””I can’t believe they’ve gone back to “quid pro quo”. It clearly didn’t happen. And it’s not a crime. What on earth is the point?”””””””””””””
Collusion is not a crime either. Look how long they dragged that out.
They’ve gone back to quid pro quo becasue Sondland delivered for them. It’s obviously a Michael Cohen type situation where the Dems have him by the family jewels and he is lying his behind off. If Sondland doesn’t play for Team Fascist the threat to his business is clear.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.