Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Chinese Navy with 10 Aircraft Carriers? It Could Happen.
The National Interest via yahoo ^ | November 13, 2019 | Richard D. Fisher Jr. ,

Posted on 11/15/2019 11:53:18 AM PST by RomanSoldier19

In his reaction to the December 6 Chinese Global Times article quoting experts saying China’s People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) may require five or six aircraft carriers, David Axe wrote an article asking, “Could Beijing really pull it off?” The short answer is that Beijing is just getting started.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; navy; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2019 11:53:18 AM PST by RomanSoldier19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Well, when your goal is to control the world....???


2 posted on 11/15/2019 11:54:17 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

You have the boat so you can land the planes and you have the planes to protect the boat, so you can land the planes. It’s a self licking ice cream cone. Who didn’t like ice cream?


3 posted on 11/15/2019 11:58:42 AM PST by datricker (Cut Taxes Repeal ACA Deport DACA - Americans First, Build the Wall, Lock her up MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Hilarious.

The Chinese haven’t even shown the ability to put a Destroyer Group 10,000 miles from home.

And folks are worried they’ll soon surpass the US Navy.

Friggin’ hilarious.


4 posted on 11/15/2019 11:59:26 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Ping.


5 posted on 11/15/2019 11:59:47 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

“Well, when your goal is to control the world....???”

And our politicians are helping you.


6 posted on 11/15/2019 12:00:13 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19; Army Air Corps; Drew68

Paid for you by the Globalists, NBA, Taylor Swift and I am sure NFL wants in China so bad they can TASTE it.


7 posted on 11/15/2019 12:01:14 PM PST by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“And folks are worried they’ll soon surpass the US Navy.
Friggin’ hilarious.”

Maybe not soon but in 10-15 years. Look how far they have come in last 10 years. Our own military said China is outspending/resesarch us on AI by 200:1

What will our military be like in 10 years if democrats get in charge?


8 posted on 11/15/2019 12:03:21 PM PST by setter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
It's nice to have goals, but quite another to achieve them.


9 posted on 11/15/2019 12:04:06 PM PST by Yo-Yo ( is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Ten targets that could and should mysteriously sink as they leave Chinese waters.


10 posted on 11/15/2019 12:05:47 PM PST by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

Not sure how targeting works but obviously there is a reason space force is thing.


11 posted on 11/15/2019 12:07:53 PM PST by RomanSoldier19 (Game over, man! Game over! ; : rem ad triarios redisse is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

The FIRST Navy with Laser anti-aircraft weapons wins.


12 posted on 11/15/2019 12:09:53 PM PST by MattMusson (Sometimes the wind blows too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

10 Carriers would secure the South China Sea.
The fixed island fortifications they have now is just a silly reprise of the failed Maginot Line.

Though I doubt the Carriers would be any more effective, maybe give them an excuse to nuke one of ours in retaliation and expect to get away with it. Kinda weak.


13 posted on 11/15/2019 12:10:36 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

1 Sat image.
10 Cruise missiles

No more carriers

Such is the world we live in today. Same goes for our carriers.


14 posted on 11/15/2019 12:12:30 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

DISMANTLE our (globalists) debt that funds them.

https://usdebtclock.org


15 posted on 11/15/2019 12:23:12 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Bar none the US Navy is the best fighting surface force on the planet. The concern is the absolutely huge amounts of money going into the CMC (Chinese Military Complex). Given enough money the numbers will over shadow the US capacity to respond. Currently there is no hope in hell the Chinese could stand a chance against a US carrier group. It comes down to numbers and e have to be able to counter that with far superior hardware and technology. The US budget should also mirror the what the Chinese are doing. Playing catchup with hypersonic weapons and their ilk is not a scenario the US wants to be in.


16 posted on 11/15/2019 12:23:34 PM PST by Nuke From Orbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: setter

> Maybe not soon but in 10-15 years. <

Yep. As an analogy, at one time the West discounted the Japanese. Then in 1905 the Japanese navy destroyed much of the Russian navy. So you never know...


17 posted on 11/15/2019 12:23:34 PM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RomanSoldier19

Noting also how many ports, canals, airfields, and warehouses the communist Chinese now control all around the world. Including in several highly strategic ( militarily) locations. This far exceeds what maybe expedient for peaceful commerce imho


18 posted on 11/15/2019 12:23:42 PM PST by faithhopecharity ( “Politicians are not , born; they are excreted.” Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datricker

One of the problems is what was demonstrated by the Pearl Harbor attack. They sunk the battleships, but technology was moving on. They shoulda got the carriers.

The way the world is going now, it’s pssible that ships that can release swarms of unmanned aircraft or drones may be far more bang for the buck than carriers. Things are definitely changing fast.

Time marches on.


19 posted on 11/15/2019 12:31:52 PM PST by cuban leaf (The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
Ten targets that could and should mysteriously sink as they leave Chinese waters.

Billions of investment that could be sunk with hundreds of thousands of missiles.

Total waste of money

20 posted on 11/15/2019 12:32:59 PM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson