Posted on 11/02/2019 4:59:40 PM PDT by NoLibZone
Edited on 11/02/2019 5:27:53 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Take a REAL close look at the cuts. The one on the right has rust on it while the other has none.
It does work, but the part that I want people to see begins at 5:50 and continues for about a half minute.
That’s why the other links, and the one in post 55 works as I wanted it to.
Thanks to Jeff Chandler who told me how to do it.
I’ve got a friend who was stupid enough to vote for Mc whateverhisnamewas. He’s kind of on board the Trump train but always the contrarian.
He bought the story. I said needs pictures to prove it. A basic recip saw may do some damage but I think it would burn up internally before cutting through.
Shoot them.
WaaPo .. Fake News. Show me pictures or it’s B.arbara S.treisand
But they’ve been saying President Trump hasn’t built any wall.
This is said to have happened in an area where electronic sensors that will detect this stuff have no been installed yet.
I’ve watched the construction of the wall sections and I’ve worked with metals. I battery operated sawsall with appropiate blades would take a long time to get through those steel slats. Also the wall sections were made to be easily replaced. That was part of their winning design, the fact that breeches would happen, but a whole section can be replaced in a day or two. I’ve noticed a great number of what I believe to be paid spammers posting here on free republic. They’ll make a somewhat positive statement to hook you and then finish up with a bit of negative propaganda they are obviously taking from a list of suggestions, so as to plant a seed of doubt. Or, in response to this article they’ll simply say something like, “This isn’t good, is it?” “not good” etc...
Good thinking.
They must have tested i
Same picture I saw on another story.
I will watch for more!
Good thinking.
They must have tested i
Same picture I saw on another story.
I will watch for more!
CANNOT get to article without bypassing the subscribe for a dollar window. NOPE
There’s no rebar in the concrete inside those bollards in that picture. The real bollards have concrete with rebar in them. This was a sample wall test. It was also obviously cut with a cutting torch, not a reciprocating saw; you can see the dripped melt steel on the upper cut, and the sputtered metal on the bottom, as well as the burned concrete. The metal here looks to be about 3/16ths inch thick, while the installed bollards have much thicker steel.
This is a fake hit job on a prototype and anyone who swallows this crap is foolish.
************
Prototypes. Look up the beam a few feet and you’ll see numbers.
2, 3, 4, etc. in doubles. This is test material trying to select the best.
imo.
Yup..AND, another lie from the lying scum press.
Non lethal?? WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT ?? Fry the bastards !
These walls need to be made of Corbomite
ABSOLUTELY Correct!
Since when has it become unacceptable to repel deadly invaders with deadly force?
Must have been sometime after March 6, 1836
Trump, you magnificent Speed Bump!
Why is ANYONE believing this crap? Where is the video?
How many times? How many people came through? How long until it was discovered and repaired? IF it even happened.
“These are the things I need to know” (Chronicles Of Riddick)
Couldn’t it be LETHALLY ELECTRIFIED?
Your post just needed a tiny grammatical correction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.