Posted on 11/01/2019 10:16:19 AM PDT by Mount Athos
Slowly but surely, the mainstream media are taking out all DEM candidates not named Hillary.
Well it’s still better than being sat on by Warren.
They’re taking themselves out one by one, don’t need the media to do it.
Good. She’s proven herself to be beyond psychotic at this point and Trump will get her goat in no time.
They did that with the Monica Lewinsky story too.
But they immediately run with anything that might hurt Trump.
They are such scum.
Bingo!
Hillary is clearing the field. Shell then come to the rescue of the party at the convention. She still controls the DNC and the super delegates.
HILLARY WILL NEVER BE THE CANDIDATE FOR ANY RACE EVER AGAIN.
Even the liberals laugh when they are asked if she will run.
She spent 1.4 billion dollars and still lost a rigged election to a political nobody.
I wish she was the candidate because then President Trump would easily win all 57 states.
But the tabloid will accept statements about Trump from unnamed sources as gospel and go to press.
Try not to fall in love too hard, ladies.
Hillary believes she won the election but it was stolen in 2016 by Russia.
Shes clearing the field of Dems. She controls the party.
Shes softening up Trump with the impeachment. Theyll run a Romney type against Trump to primary him.
Then here comes Hillary.
They have to run to keep the money flowing.
Delusional? She won the popular vote and truly believes shes destined to win. Shes running again if shes alive.
“Heh heh heh heh, hey Beavis”
Who was it that said politicians were all born in log cabins...after Lincoln...
DK
“”””Shes clearing the field of Dems. She controls the party.”
No, she doesn’t. They want her to go away.
Nobody listens to her anymore.
They gave her 1.4 billion dollars and she still lost a rigged election.
She’s done, Jim.
I actually bet on the beest running again, as I grew up in NJ and understand megalomaniacs...but you’re right. I’ve come to my senses. Even with all the dirt she has on a lot of deep staters, it’s not enough leverage to overtake the kommunist partei apparatchik power brokers. I believe her and Bill have passed their totalitarian shelf life.
If it is negative issues on a Democrat they double check, then triple check, then give the Democrat ample time to respond, then check some more, then sit on the story for a while.
For Trump the wildest accusation by any random Democrat, bureaucrat, or never Trumper is treated as gospel truth with no serious vetting.
_That_ is what passes for “journalism” today.
What the WSJ did is the big question. You can't blame the reporter if he took it to his editors and they said no, which is what seems to have happened at the NYT.
That's where liberal journalism is today.
Official government transcripts of official government meetings by local elected officials are no longer considered credible evidence when they go against the liberal media narrative.
-PJ
” ... Times spokeswoman said that the ‘records were inconclusive’ and the potential story required further sourcing.”
Since when did that ever stop the NYT from running with a story? Oh; this was about a Darling of the Democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.