Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/01/2019 5:41:21 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

I recall reading; in a very old book, that there is nothing new under the sun.


2 posted on 11/01/2019 5:44:49 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Warren = McGovern


4 posted on 11/01/2019 5:52:27 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

The left had the four major networks locked up with their propaganda. And Nixon didn’t really fight back.

Times have changed. That playbook won’t work anymore.


5 posted on 11/01/2019 5:52:59 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with islamic terrorists - they want to die for allah and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I learned something.

Good article.


7 posted on 11/01/2019 5:53:47 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Charity comes from wealth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
C-SPAN aired Nixon's November 3, 1969, speech last weekend and I watched it.

It was very well-delivered and it's easy to see why it would have influenced public opinion. But Nixon did not know the future and that South Vietnam would eventually fall to the Communists, after thousands of additional Americans had died trying to prevent that from happening.

Would it have made a difference if Nixon rather than Ford had been President in the spring of 1975 when South Vietnam and Cambodia fell to the Communists? The Democrats were determined to prevent anything being done to help the Saigon government. Could any American action at that point prevented the fall?

18 posted on 11/01/2019 8:59:19 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

bkmk


19 posted on 11/01/2019 9:20:07 AM PDT by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
An instant poll found that 70% of the country supported Nixon's declared policy. A coalition of 300 House members endorsed Nixon's stand. Liberal Democrats in the Senate rejected Nixon's policy, but Southern and conservative Democratic senators backed him.

Of yes that again sticky little inconvenient truth....liberal northeastern GOPe opposed Nixon as well as liberal Dems I’d point out

20 posted on 11/01/2019 9:25:06 AM PDT by wardaddy (I applaud Jim Robinson for his comments on the Southern Monuments decision ...thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

nattering nabobs of negativism

Spiro Theodore Agnew (9 November 1918 – 17 September 1996) Thirty-ninth Vice President of the United States, under President Richard Nixon; born Spiro Anagnostopoulos

Some relevant quotes
Perhaps the place to start looking for a credibility gap is not in the offices of the Government in Washington but in the studios of the networks in New York!
From speech delivered Nov 13, 1969 in Des Moines, Iowa

A spirit of national masochism prevails, encouraged by an effete corps of impudent snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals.
Denouncing Moratorium Day protest against Vietnam War; in NY “Times,” 20 Oct 69

In the United States today, we have more than our share of the nattering nabobs of negativism.
Speech in San Diego (11 September 1970).

Agnew’s signature quip against everything perceived to be liberal, particularly the media at that time.

This is the criminal left that belongs not in a dormitory, but in a penitentiary. The criminal left is not a problem to be solved by the Department of Philosophy or the Department of English—it is a problem for the Department of Justice…. Black or white, the criminal left is interested in power. It is not interested in promoting the renewal and reforms that make democracy work; it is interested in promoting those collisions and conflict that tear democracy apart.
Speech at a Florida Republican dinner, Fort Lauderdale, Florida (April 28, 1970); reported in Collected Speeches of Spiro Agnew (1971), p. 135


22 posted on 11/01/2019 8:26:22 PM PDT by Steven Scharf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Nixon really relished the division, though, and made use of it to get elected. Fifty years on, Nixon versus “the Establishment” is a lot murkier than it seemed at the time. How much was hype and how much was real? How much was avoidable and how much was unavoidable?


24 posted on 11/01/2019 10:03:15 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin; fieldmarshaldj; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; BillyBoy

Nixon did nothing wrong, punk *ss wussy “Republicans” let him get taken down for what wouldn’t have been a top ten scandal in the Clinton administration.


27 posted on 11/03/2019 6:00:39 PM PST by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson