Skip to comments.
NY Times Journalist Engages in Bizarre, What-If Impeachment Fantasy
Newsbusters ^
| October 29, 2019
| P.J. Gladnick
Posted on 10/29/2019 9:30:08 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Another NYT impeachment fairy tale and it sounds like Carl Hulse has been sniffing Tinker Bell's white powder Pixie dust.
1
posted on
10/29/2019 9:30:08 AM PDT
by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
Creative Writing assignment by a High School student.
2
posted on
10/29/2019 9:32:47 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: PJ-Comix
Remove Trump at your own peril.
3
posted on
10/29/2019 9:33:27 AM PDT
by
bk1000
(I stand with Trump)
To: PJ-Comix
Most of the voting population would view this as a successful Coup d’état
4
posted on
10/29/2019 9:33:31 AM PDT
by
Steve Van Doorn
(*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
To: PJ-Comix
In what world would this kind of thing be considered journalism?
5
posted on
10/29/2019 9:34:55 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: blueunicorn6
6
posted on
10/29/2019 9:35:29 AM PDT
by
silverleaf
(Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
To: PJ-Comix
What kind of rainbows, unicorns, and fluffy bunnies live in his world. Obviously his shrink has given him mood altering drugs to ameliorate his TDS.
7
posted on
10/29/2019 9:36:39 AM PDT
by
Waverunner
(I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
To: PJ-Comix
Math is not their strong suit.
8
posted on
10/29/2019 9:37:03 AM PDT
by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
To: PJ-Comix
Implicit in his fantasy is the fear that Trump would win the election, even after impeachment removal from office, and that that has to be thwarted. The author holds America and Americans in contempt.
To: rightwingcrazy
These are the people who talk about democracy, democracy, democracy. They desperately want to save our democracy.
And the way to do that, apparently, is to overturn the lawful 2016 election and to make sure that the voters are not allowed to vote again for the guy they prefer. His popularity makes him dangerous.
10
posted on
10/29/2019 9:50:23 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: PJ-Comix
Just to triple check, somewhere along the line, someone accounts for SCOTUS ruling that ‘Orange Man Bad’ being an acceptable high crime for the House to impeach on, right? They’ve tapped Roberts or someone to give a green light to turning impeachment into little more than a spectacular No Confidence vote that undoes an election?
11
posted on
10/29/2019 9:53:23 AM PDT
by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: ClearCase_guy
They dont view that election as democracy. They think Hillary should be president because of the popular vote.
To: PJ-Comix
I haven't visited the DUmpster Kids website in a while but its easy for me to imagine their impeachment porn:
"We can have "Drumpf" out of office by February on a dozen high crimes.Then we immediately go after Pence...for being a Christian...and we can have him out of office by May.And then: President Nancy Pelosi!"
To: kingu
The SCOTUS itself plays no role in impeachment or its trial. Impeachment is the sole preserve of the HoR and the trial is conducted in the Senate. During impeachment of the President the Senate is presided over by the Chief Justice (presumably to avoid a conflict of interest if the VP were presiding. Remember under the original rules the VP was the man who came in 2nd). The House can impeach for anything it wants and claim it is a high crime/misdemeanor.
Democrats have been talking about impeachment since November 2016. Their latest ‘crime’a withholding of funds to Ukraine is just the latest in a long line of terrible things that PDJT is or has done. It really does all boil down to Orange Man Bad.
14
posted on
10/29/2019 10:08:21 AM PDT
by
hanamizu
To: PJ-Comix
Scratchin my head...How would he be able to serve again ?
Constitution -
Article I, section 3, clause 7 provides that “judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States.”
15
posted on
10/29/2019 10:14:04 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
To: hanamizu
16
posted on
10/29/2019 10:15:37 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: timestax
17
posted on
10/29/2019 10:19:30 AM PDT
by
timestax
To: PJ-Comix
Impeachment didnt stop Clinton from being re-elected
18
posted on
10/29/2019 10:20:18 AM PDT
by
The Great RJ
("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
To: PJ-Comix
I have a fantasy that Carl Hulse's mental illness is cured.
19
posted on
10/29/2019 10:20:40 AM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
(Kill-googl,TWTR,FCBK,NYT,WaPo,Hwd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antfa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA,ARP)
To: The Great RJ
Uh, you do know what year Clinton was impeached, right?
20
posted on
10/29/2019 10:22:05 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson