Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

I’m confused on the rats’ impeachment vote Thursday. If it passes, will Republican lawmakers be able to bring these previous witnesses back in for public testimony?


4 posted on 10/28/2019 3:44:48 PM PDT by hardspunned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hardspunned

They’d better... no conflicts, witness tampering or premeditated corruption here: /s

The links may be particularly instructive after Breitbart News reported that itinerary for a trip to Ukraine in August organized by the Burisma-funded Atlantic Council for ten Congressional aides reveals that a staffer on Rep. Adam Schiff’s House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence held a meeting during the trip with Taylor. The pre-planned trip took place after the so-called whistleblower officially filed his August 12 complaint and reportedly after a Schiff aide was contacted by the so-called whistleblower.


6 posted on 10/28/2019 3:54:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: hardspunned
My guess is that they will try to pass a bill that formalizes the Impeachment hearing but does not offer the full due process protections that have been offered previous presidents.

Whether they can get enough people to vote for it. I don't know. Hopefully it dies Thursday.

Republicans need to be prepared to scream loud if they don't have enough time to review it and/or if it doesn't offer enough due process.

And the Republicans better still vote against it even if it offers due process, because there is no basis for this.

Pelosi might be using this as an out. Let the vote fail and wrap it up.

They know it's going to fail in the Senate. And the Senate is about to repudiate them for the partisan investigation. My guess is that they are reading the polls and it's not good.

7 posted on 10/28/2019 3:56:22 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: hardspunned
What they have done to date....IIRC....is what Hillary proposed as the method to impeach Nixon. And IIRC, they don't her that it was unconstitutional because it took away Nixon's right to counsel, etc etc....

I believe that is what has happened to date....and that implicates (in my mind at least) Hillary if you want to connect all the dots.

Go back and look at her record on her proposal to impeach Nixon.

8 posted on 10/28/2019 3:58:04 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: hardspunned

I’M SO HAPPY YOU BROUGHT THIS UP.

I’LL REPEAT WHAT YOU SAID.

PLEASE, PLEASE BRING BACK THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE TESTIFIED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS. THEY ...MUST...BE QUESTIONED AGAIN!!!


20 posted on 10/28/2019 4:53:39 PM PDT by Maris Crane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson