Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/25/2019 2:05:55 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: yesthatjallen

How convenient.


2 posted on 10/25/2019 2:07:41 PM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Are the Democrats going to leak the names and addresses of the jurors now?


3 posted on 10/25/2019 2:08:42 PM PDT by chris37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

When you can predict a judge’s decision based on who appointed him, we don’t have a judiciary.


4 posted on 10/25/2019 2:12:47 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Meaningless PR stunt. They all ready gone thur all this. Just a desperation play by the Democrat Fascists feeling the noose tightening around their necks.
5 posted on 10/25/2019 2:13:33 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This will be appealed or enjoined. They will get nothing.


6 posted on 10/25/2019 2:14:18 PM PDT by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

If Mueller couldn’t find it in his own report, why would anyone else?


7 posted on 10/25/2019 2:14:46 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This type of ruling goes right to the heart of the separation of powers in the U.S. government. The Federal judiciary has no business adjudicating disputes like this between the executive and legislative branches of government in the first place. An “impeachment inquiry” has no legal meaning in a court proceeding.


9 posted on 10/25/2019 2:15:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This is going to sound nuts but I feel as though I am watching a contest to see which person(s) releases damning evidence first.


10 posted on 10/25/2019 2:18:30 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Barr will tell the court to pound sand.


11 posted on 10/25/2019 2:18:54 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Barr will tell the court to pound sand.


12 posted on 10/25/2019 2:19:05 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Didn’t they do this already a few months ago and Barr told them to get stuffed because it’s his report ?


14 posted on 10/25/2019 2:20:15 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

The judge should have ordered the Dems to conduct impeachment in the traditional manner before issuing this ruling.


16 posted on 10/25/2019 2:24:01 PM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

“Judge Beryl Howell, an Obama appointee”

That is all we need to know.


17 posted on 10/25/2019 2:26:01 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

I highly doubt a judge can hand down such edicts whenever...hope they tell the judge to take a flying leap.


18 posted on 10/25/2019 2:29:11 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Let them have a look. At this point, what does it matter? :)

The real show is just starting, and it doesn't follow the flailing and failing narrative that the dims set up to try and deflect from what is coming via Barr and Durham.

All of this Fire and Fury from Shiff for brains and Porky Pig signifies nothing other than a distraction from the main event.

Let them drool all they want. Their comeuppance is approaching.

19 posted on 10/25/2019 2:31:08 PM PDT by Pox (Good Night. I expect more respect tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

So much for Legality regarding protecting Witnesses who are not under investigation who Testify to a Grand Jury.

Wait, wouldn’t that make those same Witnesses Whistleblowers?


20 posted on 10/25/2019 2:32:51 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Kill a Commie for your Mommy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Howell gave DOJ until Wednesday, Oct. 30, to comply.


Now that’s how Democrats work. 5 days to comply. Compare to the GOP taking 3 years to start a criminal investigation of Deep State Democrats.


21 posted on 10/25/2019 2:33:47 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

.... Don’t forget that the Democrats find high crimes with anything with Trumps name in it ..... Just look at the Ukraine phone call transcript for an example ..... Imagine what they could make up with the entire Mueller Report ....


23 posted on 10/25/2019 2:34:37 PM PDT by R_Kangel ("A nation of sheep will beget a nation ruled by wolves")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
I was just thinking, it's Friday and some a-hole district judge obummer appointee hasn't released an opinion aimed to hurt President Trump....yet.

Oh well,the deep state didn't let me down.

25 posted on 10/25/2019 2:36:14 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

She was the federal judge supervising the Grand Jury in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference. - Wikipedia


29 posted on 10/25/2019 2:39:58 PM PDT by Help!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson