Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo

From what I have read and actually tested myself, the 5.56 with the heavy bullets does fine in several respects.

It shoots flat, penetrates well, and has low recoil. The real problem is that it does not hit hard. Part of that is due to the short barrels in the M4.

They could probably do a lot worse than the 6.5X50, Jap.


16 posted on 10/23/2019 3:26:38 PM PDT by yarddog ( For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yarddog

6.5x50 is a lot closer to a full power rifle round than they are looking for. Also, the 5.56 sucks against modern opponent body armor.

Read more here: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/what-we-know-about-armys-new-bullets-68052


20 posted on 10/23/2019 3:34:14 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog

I’ve had a wildcat caliber 260 AAR (6.5mm w/necked down 7mm case w/40 degree shoulder) for over 50 years.

It’s deadly accurate with 100gr bullets and not shabby with 120gr.


22 posted on 10/23/2019 3:40:10 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have You Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: yarddog

I wonder if Beto knows that bullets fired from an AR-15’s 16” barrel have more energy than those fired from the military’s M-4s.

Not really...I’m certain that he doesn’t know.


79 posted on 10/23/2019 6:45:32 PM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson