Eric is sitting right there.
https://t.co/7Ud0WLyo4g— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 23, 2019
Oh and Macron’s granny is pissed that she didn’t think to wear an elegant hat.
Maybe the whistleblower is a composite—like the early girlfriends in Obama’s autobiography (actually biography, since it was likely written by Bill Ayers). In other words, a fiction.
That is not to say that if pressed, they won’t be able to find someone to act the role.
Now when two people do the same thing about the same thing, it means they are colluding....in addition to lying.
Whoever he is he’s being “protected” because the President wants to whack him...kinda like Tommy in Goodfellas.
It has been a month now and we have absolutely nothing from the impeachment inquiry. The supposed whistleblower has gone silent. The democrats are coming up with new things to elongate the impeachment farce such as U. S. Diplomat Willam Taylor testifing to the democrats in secret, something that they claim is different from what Trump has said. Come on democrats, let us see some action on impeachment, not more talk.
Now a Vienna diplomat is saying something about it... it is the Kavanaugh metoo train.
He was only a figment of SchifftyEye's imagination before Trump unexpectedly released the transcript of the subject phone call. Once he released it, and the WB's 3rd hand version didn't match the actual transcript, SchifftyEye started backing away from using them.
It was also discovered that the WB had met with Schiffty's staff before writing the complaint, which leads any clear-thinking adult to assume that the staff helped write the complaint for the WB to match their narrative.
Schiffty then announced that they didn't want the WB to testify because he was getting death threats. They wanted to protect him. And yet not one curious media reporter thought to ask the obvious question, how could this person be getting death threats if nobody knew who they were?
Then Schiffty backed off even more by saying they wouldn't need to use the WB as a witness at all because they had lots of other collaborating evidence and witnesses that Trump violated the law. Sounds very familiar to Schiffty's claim that he had lots of evidence, that he never produced, that Trump had colluded with the Russians prior to the Mueller epic fail report was released.
Then he takes the whole affair underground in secret and starts fabricating evidence and witnesses to match the narrative that Trump asked for Ukraine to investigate Biden's son for his involvement with a board in Ukraine.
And even though there was brief time when Schiffty said there was a 2nd WB, they have both disappeared from the scene and the new narrative Schiffty is trying to weave to impeach Trump with.
None of this will hold up unless and until there is a vote on this impeachment stunt in the full House. It will not advance to the Senate for a trial if the process of arriving at articles of impeachment in the House wasn't open and transparent.
I doubt whether we will ever hear about WB#1 or WB#2 again.