Posted on 10/21/2019 3:44:14 AM PDT by Kaslin
Is anyone stating plainly that Hillary is evil crazy? Just because some Democrat creep says something must we debate this insanity?
We can see what we have and what we could have, nuff sed
1: Most of the other candidates are already fatally damaged.
2: Gabbard is the worst threat to Clinton’s outside-track path to coronation fir a third try.
3: Insider polls show her much higher than she is.
4: Hillary wants her as her VP candidate, but to do that needs to raise her profile.
Then we can forget about her.
“...faults and all...”
The rhetoric of a never-Trumper. They just can’t help discrediting President Trump at every turn. Geez, can’t they just give us a break?
2: Gabbard is the worst threat to Clinton’s outside-track path to coronation fir a third try.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nobody cares what hillary has to say. She will never be a candidate again for anything.
HILLIARY Tulsi. JIll Warren are all in the CRAB POT and when one of these girls want to escape, HILLIARY will pull them back down in. She will NOT let a female be PRESIDENT before she IS!
The Clintons mastered the art of being against something, then “becoming enlightened” and being “for” it. Completely craven and fake.
In this case, Hillary would come to see the light and choose Gabbard as her VP candidate in a desperate run against Trump.
I’m not saying that’s what she’s doing, but I wouldn’t put anything past her.
Makes sense...Gabbard is an obstacle,even if its Warren she's trying to help.
Hillary wants her as her VP candidate, but to do that needs to raise her profile.
Gabbard would never sell herself or her constituency out like that.
Sounds like someone’s a little jealous!
Warms my heart to know that Hitlery will NEVER EVER be president in my lifetime.
Middle school female social dynamics.
Bitches always go after the pretty girl.
...wouldn’t put anything past her.
_______________________________________
Wasn’t it quite recently that HRC predicted the GOP would would stealthily back a 3rd party candidate in order to divide the prog vote and re-elect POTUS?
Now: Russians=GOP=Trump?
I do seem to recall exactly that.
This is especially hysterical coming from hillary. But for the presence of third party candidate Ross Perot, there may have never been a president Clinton (mr. 43%). In fact, no candidate named Clinton has EVER won a majority of votes cast in ANY presidential election.
I don’t believe that Hillary is nearly this clever, and I suspect that Stein’s assessment makes the most sense as Hillary is fixated STILL on her loss and her comment speaks directly toward more denial, but I still say that Tulsi is the democrats best chance to beat Trump if the calculus is right. All of the others have positions themselves to far left to win independents. Tulsi, on the other hand, can steal non-interventionalists as well as any independents who don’t want Medicare for all schemes and don’t like Trumps bombastic style. The big wildcard would be how much Tulsi gets hurt by a lack of hard left base fanaticism and the getting out of democrat voters, which I contend is not enough to offset the difference, because most democrats are brainwashed by the media and just want Trump gone with a hysteric fervor. Hillary can’t possibly be clever enough (let alone unselfish enough) to elevate Tulsi for the party though.
Hillary is not a qualified strategist. Se shoots from all the wrong places. She is never cool and deliberate. She is always hot and nasty. Watch her incantation turn into a new monster that will eat this sourcerer’s apprentice alive.
<><>She was a shoo in---
<><>Obama had the fix in for a permanent Democrat majority-
<><> the entire US intel apparat was at Hillary's disposal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.