Posted on 10/19/2019 7:40:57 AM PDT by janetjanet998
A review launched by Attorney General William Barr into the origins of the Russia investigation has expanded significantly amid concerns about whether the probe has any legal or factual basis, multiple current and former officials told NBC News.
Durham has also requested to talk to CIA analysts involved in the intelligence assessment of Russia’s activities, prompting some of them to hire lawyers, according to three former CIA officials familiar with the matter. And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.
And there is tension between the CIA and the Justice Department over what classified documents Durham can examine, two people familiar with the matter said.
Why is it controversial? I thought they wanted to find out who caused all the Russia collusion? Isn’t that what Mueller spent 2 years looking for?
No bias there on the part of NBC.
NBC implies Barr is out of control.
No, pee-cock network, the Obama’s DOJ/FBI was out of control!
More to cover up?
Note the word “controversial” in the headline. There is nothing controversial about what Mr. Barr is doing. This is just more fake news.
Although the probe did not begin as a criminal investigation, Justice Department officials won’t comment on whether it has morphed into one.
whether the probe has any legal or factual basis,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Laws were broken, of course it has legal and factual basis, the Ministry of Propaganda would rather you did not know that.
Controversial? They never said that about Mueller.
Oh and if they did nothing wrong why are they hiring lawyers?
NBC actually acknowledging this investigation exists? Describing it as controversial? They are getting scared. Hey NBC if Misfud was a Russian spy then Western intel has been compromised. Big story if true. If Misfud is a western spy then Russian collusion is a hoax and a set-up. Big story if true. Maybe even a Pulitzer for covering either path. Why not ask your “sources” to clarify? What kind of reporters are you?
Why yes I suppose an investigation about a corrupt neo fascist police state attempt to spy on a political opponent is “controversial” to the guilty.
I find it interesting that both the New York Times and NBC both have in depth stories about Durham this morning
The second sentence is pure crap...
Why is it controversial?
Review of Russia Inquiry Grows as F.B.I. Witnesses Are Questioned
The mainstream media is now coordinating their narrative; that the Durham/Barr investigations are nothing more than Trump seeking revenge on his political enemies.
Make no mistake. This is a COORDINATED hit-job.
I think that’s what bar is looking into...if the Obama investigation of Trump had any legal or factual basis.
Hint: It did not. Unless you consider spying on the other team legal.
POST OF THE DAY.
It’s just like “partisan.” Only applies to Republicans.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.