Skip to comments.Producers of the Flailing Impeachment Inquiry
Posted on 10/13/2019 5:47:41 AM PDT by upchuck
Believing Adam Schiffs lies and calling for an impeachment inquiry has to be one of the worst blunders of Speaker Pelosis career. The whistleblower tale has crumbled and the backup witnesses the Democrats are relying on only confirm the Deep State bureaucrats and Democrats believe that they, not the elected president, have a lock on executive powers. In fact, the ploy boomeranged and the spotlight is now on the Democrats White Hope, Joe Biden. Despite the media downplaying Bidens actions, there is more to come of his and his partys corruption.
Whistleblower Wont Testify
The leaker, incorrectly tagged a whistleblower, now doesnt want to testify. Instead he wants to give his testimony by letter, presumably from an undisclosed location where no one can test his testimony. Ostensibly this is because he fears for his safety. He is anonymous, so any claim of death threats seems unlikely, although as we show below, we do have a rather good idea of his identity.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
If you'd like to be on or off the Clarice Feldman ping list, usually issued only on Sunday morning, please click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.
I have a simple question for the “whistleblower”.
Which is more dangerous:
(1) Keeping your anonymity and taking a midnight stroll in SE Washington DC?
(2) Revealing your identity while living in your posh DC suburb.
I welcome the testimony - but only if it is rendered in Haiku form...
Nancy had no choice but to support Schiff’s accusations. She is caught in corruption along with Biden, Schiff and, perhaps, many other Democrats unless they can shut Trump down. Their only defense is to smear Trump to distract from their own culpability. Ultimately this will fail.
The more this RAT fiasco unravels the more fun it is to watch.
Another good one from Clarice.
Orange man is bad.
Whistle blower blows it hard.
Whistle makes no sound.
Very good write up of the corrupt Democrats, but as we all know, this is but the tip of the iceberg.
“The real reason for this backoff, I think, is that once his identity is confirmed, it will be clear this was a stupid setup by amateurs in Congress who wanted to cover their tracks.”
No, the real reason the leaker doesn’t want to be identified is because they would have to appear before the various House committees and be subjected to Republican questions and either answer truthfully or commit perjury, questions such as:
1. How many people contributed to the writing of this document?
2. How many people helped you do this?
3. How many times did you meet with Schiff staff and/or committee remembers?
4. Who did you meet on Schiff’s committe or staff?
5. How much did Schiff committee members and/or staff help you with this?
6. How many sources did you have?
7. Who are your sources?
8. Who are the White House staff who provided you information?
As Sam Ervin said during the height of the Watergate investigation, "You can't cross-examine a piece of paper."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.