Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Insanity and the Supreme Court (Today first cases of term)
Wall Street Journal ^ | October 6 | Stephen J. Morse and Richard J. Bonnie

Posted on 10/07/2019 5:45:24 AM PDT by PghBaldy

James Kraig Kahler intentionally shot and killed his wife, their two teenage daughters and Mrs. Kahler’s grandmother in 2009. Now he’s going to the Supreme Court. At his Kansas trial, the defense psychiatrist testified that Mr. Kahler had lost touch with reality due to a serious mental disorder. But the defendant couldn’t offer an insanity defense, because Kansas passed a law abolishing it in 1995.

Some form of an insanity defense has been part of English law since the late Middle Ages.

(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: insanity; insanitydefense; judiciary; kahler; murder; scotus
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES GRANTED & NOTED LIST OCTOBER TERM 2019 CASES FOR ARGUMENT

Three arguments for today:

18-801 CFX PETER V. NANTKWEST, INC. Court: USCA-Fed.

18-5924 CSY RAMOS V. LOUISIANA Court: CA-LA, 4th Cir.

18-6135 CSY KAHLER V. KANSAS Court: SC-KS

https://www.supremecourt.gov/grantednotedlist/19grantednotedlist

1 posted on 10/07/2019 5:45:24 AM PDT by PghBaldy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

I guess you’re not as dead if you’re murdered by a crazy person as you would be if you were murdered by a sane person. It seems to me that the action should be judged on its merits not on the conversations the murderer has with his dog or the voices in his head.


2 posted on 10/07/2019 5:53:58 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
I'd like to hear an explanation of how someone who murders multiple people could possibly be sane. Murder is almost always an irrational action.

The common law excuse for insanity was almost always aimed at minor crimes. To apply it to major crimes - well, you end up in situations like this where a legislature acts rationally to remove it as an excuse in capital crimes and it is before SCOTUS.

3 posted on 10/07/2019 6:04:50 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

“ Some form of an insanity defense has been part of English law since the late Middle Ages.”

Misleading statement. Many states have a “guilty, but insane” provision that finds the person guilty, but remanded to a Psychiatric ward until/if the perp is sane enough to go to prison.


4 posted on 10/07/2019 6:28:57 AM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

This is a much more accurate statement.

And the bar for an insanity defense has always been very high.

There are those among us who are mentally to the point where they truly cannot be culpable. If not for the libtards who created the ACLU and its ilk, those unfortunate people would not be living outside of locked units.

The percentage of the mentally ill who are a threat is actually quite small.

Until you through drugs into the mix.


5 posted on 10/07/2019 6:37:52 AM PDT by jazminerose (Adorable Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson