Until there’s a vote, there’s no impeachment.
Ignore them.
And who exactly is this Ramsey Doucheberry that wrote this article?
Can Pelosi pass laws without a vote?
“Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: “The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” ”
That very well could mean that every member of the House would have to vote in favor of impeachment.
she can inquire all she wants.
and PDJT can flush all her inquires down the nearest toilet.
and should.
and definitely should.
we’ve all had far too much of these lies and bullsheit and obstructionism from the DNC ruling clique
Trump isn’t obligated to contribute to fishing expeditions. Tell Nacy to FOAD, because the next target will be how her and her husband made millions of dollars. Quid Pro Quo bitch, and you ain’t running for President. Then Star indicting Cummings, Schumer and the rest of the swamp crooks.
“Why Pelosi Doesn’t Need a Full House Vote for an Impeachment Inquiry, Despite Trump’s Demand”
Why President Trump doesn’t even need to invoke executive privilege to ignore partisan demand letters that have no legal authority.
Just ignore her completely till she does or she just tries to outright impeach.
blahblahblaheverythingpelosidoesisritetrumpsux.
Because if this had been Obama v Ryan you’d know they’d be screaming just as hard that Ryan was attempting a coup
Pelosi is running a kangaroo court.
Any proceedings or results of such court actions will be considered moot and void. A complete waste of time, for congress and the president and the country.
IOW, there is absolutely nothing serious being done with this so-called impeachment inquiry.
A regular court outside of Washington would have tossed out the case before it even got started, and those prosecuting the case would have been disbarred.
My crystal ball sees Trump gaining another 5 points in the polls.
But a House vote is required by the courts for a subpoena.
So, the plan is to issue a bunch of unenforceable subpoenas and then have a House vote to impeach him for not responding to the unenforceable subpoenas- obstruction!
With the media working as hard as it can they just might fool enough people to get away with it!
Hey, it’s Newsweek.
May as well be titled -
Why Our Nancy god Don’t Need No Constitution For Nuffen
Touchberry? Really? I can only imagine his experiences in school.
If Pelosi thought she had the votes, she would have impeached the President already. So... she either doesn’t have the votes OR she is protecting the Demo Reps from districts that Trump won BIG. This whole thing is a sham.
FReepers wanting to read the article but also want to avoid a trip to msn.com, always a good idea, can find the original article here:
https://www.newsweek.com/why-pelosi-does-not-need-full-house-vote-impeachment-inquiry-1463320
Pelosi needs to file her unemployment insurance soon i think.
Nancy does not have a full house or a full deck
We have 3 co-equal branches of gov’t. The House has no superior right over the Executive. They have the Power of Impeachment but, that does not mean the Executive must roll over and bare their neck to the demands of the House.
With Impeachment there is precedent. President Trump is justified in demanding precedent be followed.
If the House wants impeachment let them stand up and be counted. And, let the chips then fall where they may.
Best President EVER!