Posted on 10/04/2019 5:21:35 PM PDT by Sir Napsalot
No wonder the Dems are nervous: The alleged Russian hacking of the DNCs computers is proving to be a Hillary campaign and DNC scam that went unchallenged by Messrs. Comey and Mueller.
In his telephone conversation with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky, President Trump requested Ukraines help in getting to the bottom of the Russian collusion narrative and the role of CrowdStrike, a private computer security company, in propagating that story. Lost in the volcanic eruption of faux outrage and condemnation aimed at the president by the Democrats and their wholly owned media subsidiary, this reference to CrowdStrike indicates that the Justice Departments investigation of the counterintelligence operation against candidate and president-elect Trump may be hot on the trail of exposing what could well be a seminal lie that the Democratic National Committees computer server was hacked by Russian operatives.
(snip)
In their breathless coverage of the Russian hacking story, the media downplayed the very odd behavior of the DNC, the putative victim. For, when the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI learned of the hacking claim, they asked to examine the server.
But the DNC refused.
Why would the purported victim of a crime refuse to cooperate with law enforcement in solving that crime? Was it hiding something? Was it afraid the servers contents would discredit the Russia-hacking story?
(more snip)
As set forth in its memorandum, VIPS's investigative findings were nothing short of stunning.
First, VIPS concluded that the DNC data were not hacked by the Russians or anyone else accessing the server over the internet. Instead, the data were downloaded by means of a thumb drive or similar portable storage device physically attached to the DNC server....
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
Cloudstrike = Ecomcon
It wasn't meant to. It shows that the timestamps do not prove that the files were taken with direct access to the computer.
The Democrats acted like there was evidence of the OPM hack on their system. What was it Maxine said about the Democrats having a setup where they know everybody and everything?
Office of Personnel Management data breach - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Personnel_Management_data_breach
In June 2015, the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) announced that it had been the target of a data breach targeting the records of as many as four million people. The final estimate of the number of stolen records is approximately 21.5 million.
Yeah.
Great information to post!!
No one arrested. No one indicted. No one sent to prison.
And no one will be.
>>>Its a Ukrainian company
No, it is a US company, publicly traded on the Nasdaq. It’s founder, often cited as Ukranian, was born in Moscow, moved to the US as a teenager, and is now a US citizen.
I'm not sure how file creation dates are germane. I've always assumed with the DNC was that the sheer volume of data transferred made it unlikely that it was done remotely. Just 10 GB would take at least 14 hours to Xfer (if I'm reading it right). Fourteen hours is a LOT of time for something like that NOT to be noticed. Server slowdown, etc etc. Whereas copying it over a thumbdrive would take about 2 or 3 minutes.
Crowdstrike has an Aura.
FBI = hands off
DOJ ditto
Mueller ditto
Why was Epstein hands off for so long?
Why did Epstein return to simply suicide?
Why did google’s Schmidt put 100million into CS with knowledge of Alperavich involvement?
Connect the redactions... CS is a CIA shop.
bmp
This is an information war.
If a majority of the population eventually understands what happened, that will translate into a reelection of President Trump and recapture of the house.
Just like when communism collapsed in Russia, no one went to jail for the horrendous crimes but it still was a very good thing.
Not true at all...
I have moved considerable amounts of data from one drive to another or from a drive to a cloud drive and did not use .zip or any other software to compress it or otherwise manipulate it. We are talking multiple gigabytes of multi formatted files from pictures documents, all of it
The files all moved successfully from one drive to another and they work flawlessly
I have also use >zip to move a cluster of files from a cloud drive to a system based drive and the expanded the zip back into files
What Binney said was the time for the transfer and the number of files cannot be done over a network link as the data speed needed to so so is not available given the payload and the time to transfer. Only when a flash drive is plugged in as a locally accessible device can that speed as shown in the meta data be achieved, zipped or not
Game over
And a PS.
I have transferred drive contents of multi gigabytes to a cloud drive in their native format and that much data in that little time does not happen, I have been in the computing business for 46 years and I am certified on Unix/Linux and others
What Binney said was the time for the transfer and the number of files cannot be done over a network link as the data speed needed to so so is not available given the payload and the time to transfer. Only when a flash drive is plugged in as a locally accessible device can that speed as shown in the meta data be achieved, zipped or not
I read the VIPS memos. The metadata are file time stamps. Agreed? Expanding a zip archive on the destination host can generate similar time stamps. No matter how long the transfer took. I'm not saying that happened. It could have happened.
I have transferred drive contents of multi gigabytes to a cloud drive in their native format and that much data in that little time does not happen . . .
I have transferred entire UNIX filesystems over T1 lines back when we didn't use silly terms like cloud. Unix tar piped to gzip piped to scp. Took all night. Timestamps didn't show how long it took.
Biden is having ‘issues”, Bernie had a heart attack, Fakahontas is doubling down on her warpath, Spartacus is considering hanging up his sword and net....it’s ripe for Hillary to announce...
Wouldn’t it be sweet to actually lock her up...lock her up...
“”””Crowdstrike previously claimed to have uncovered a major cyberespionage case wherein Russians, likely GRU, hacked into a Ukrainian artillery control system, and used the data to target counterbattery fire. They claimed large percentages of Ukrainian artillery pieces were destroyed because of this.””””
This couldn’t have worked without sharks and lasers.
They prove that it was impossible to copy the files via an internet hack due to the download speed of which the internet is totally incapable of handling.
If not an internet hack, what's the only alternative?
Speaking of Hillary...
My memory is that the claims of an extraordinary percentage of destruction of the artillery pieces tied to the control system turned out to be false. No more than those without it. That supports your conclusion.
I’ll admit that Crowdstrike might have been merely trying to build its business by hyping the situation. But “who benefits” from convincing the Ukrainians not to use their most modern military technology against their Russian-backed opponenents? Makes me wonder if Crowdstrike was either working for GPU, or fooled by them. Both are good reasons to press Ukraine to investigate Crowdstrike, and why Crowdstrike’s involvement with the DNC is extremely suspect.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.