Posted on 10/04/2019 11:15:11 AM PDT by CedarDave
SANTA FE, N.M. Methane sensors will be put on planes, trucks and atop towers in the West Texas and southeastern New Mexico desert in a new effort to gauge the extent of greenhouse gas emissions from surging oil and natural gas production, advocates with the Environmental Defense Fund announced Wednesday.
The yearlong project in the Permian Basin petroleum production region involves researchers from Pennsylvania State University and the University of Wyoming, and low-flying planes from a Colorado-based atmospheric research company.
The new methods will be used because traditional estimates of methane emissions have not kept up with the rapid expansion petroleum exploration in the area spanning roughly 85,000 square miles (220,000 square miles), said Environmental Defense Fund Regulatory Affairs Director Jon Goldstein.
(Excerpt) Read more at abqjournal.com ...
Of course NM's new far left radical governor has taken up the cause by directing state regulators to develop new oilfield rules to limit methane emissions. Of course this goes beyond air quality, but another attempt, like using the Endangered Species Act, to curtail fossil fuel drilling and production.
NM list PING!
I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics
To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keyword
To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages
(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for FR member use; its use in the News Forum should not be for trivial or inconsequential posts. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)
These people are brain dead idiots, morons and imbeciles.................
Will they put methane sensors on farms and ranches?
(Snif snif)
Is that methane I smell?
Or FedGov grant money being poured out???
Ok, so who will be paying for these sensors?
Public money should not be used to bolster hoaxes.
Methane as a compound, has a relatively low molecular weight, less than even that of water vapor, and rises quickly into the atmosphere, composed mostly of N2 and O2 molecules, both of which are heavier than either methane or water vapor. But unlike water vapor, as methane is cooled, it never gets cold enough to change its state from gas to liquid or solid state. It just keeps rising and escapes into outer space, much like hydrogen or helium.
If the methane is flared off, it produces water vapor and carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide tends NOT to rise in the atmosphere, as its molecular weight is GREATER than the mixture of N2 and O2, but it does readily dissolve in water, where much of it ends up as some form of carbonate mineral. Or it becomes sparkling mineral water.
Remember that while you sip on your Seven-Up - you are swallowing carbon dioxide.
Article doesn't say but probably donors to the EDF from the likes of Soros and Tom Steyer.
Is flatulence a problem at these locations?
Will they put methane sensors on cattle, pigs, chickens, horses, goats, dogs, cats and the humans on farms and ranches?
Will any of the above or us be fined for exceeding our daily or hourly methane releases.
Oh my gosh, sensors on the humans? Better watch what types of food we eat, just saying.
Most methane comes from fissures in the ocean floor.
He who smelt it, dealt it.
This just screams HS Senior party.
Not in New Mexico, at least not now. The eco-nuts are hoping to use results from the oil/gas industry to bolster controls so as to lower US fossil fuel energy production, which to them is worse than emissions from farms and ranches.
Actually as a concentrated point source, dairy farms and feedlots produce a lot of emissions including methane and ammonia (we have many dairies in the area and when driving by them you close the windows). A quick search shows there are many studies of emissions from the cows and cattle in the US, but I don’t know what percentage of total US methane releases are from them.
Long live the hockey stick...
***greenhouse gas emissions***
And to think, back around 1981, POPULAR SCIENCE magazine, I believe, editorialized that they would no longer use the term “Greenhouse Effect” as it was no longer true. We were still in the COMING ICE AGE effect.
These are the ‘rats that got DDT banned.
“Flaring” does NOT “release methane”. Flaring BURNS methane, and releases CO2 and H2O. DAMN all ignorant journalists!
They oppose that too! They say by burning it, it wastes a valuable resource that could be sold for money to the state. Presently there is a glut of natural gas here and not yet pipeline capacity to move it to locations for sale. It's all just another move to put a stranglehold on the industry they hate (except for the mega-bucks coming to the state treasury).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.