Posted on 10/03/2019 9:00:27 PM PDT by Helicondelta
The Democrat whistleblower who complained about Trump digging up dirt in Ukraine was himself helping dig up dirt in Ukraine against Trump (and Manafort) while working in the Obama White House during 2016 campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Then, the next question will likely be "Mr. Brennan, when did you first see the individual elements of the Dossier, before it was compiled into the "Steele Dossier"?"
Everyone who has a brain knows that Brennan was trying to launder the Dossier so it didn't have his fingerprints on it, which would raise the question of why he didn't vet the information.
Brennan was trying to set up, and apparently successfully did, a "parallel construction scheme" where the same information from the same source (via Steele who got it from the top Russian disinformation specialist in their government-see the link below) is laundered and fed to different inputs into the government, in this case the State Department, FBI and DOJ, so they all think they are seeing the same information from different sources, which is quite different from seeing the same information from the same source.
Steele met with a State Department functionary Kavalec in October 2016 and in that interview where there is a typed summary, AND the initial handwritten notes taken by Kavalec, Steele says he got his information about Trump from former Russian foreign intelligence chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Putin aide Vladislav Surkov: Link: Chuck Ross, Daily Caller: "Steele Identified Russian Dossier Sources, Notes Reveal"
It is important to note that Trubnikov, the former head of the SVR, also has links to Stefan Halper, an FBI informant who had contact with the Trump campaign, most famously with George Papadopoulos who he lured to London (hmmm...outside CONUS where the Brits could spy on him and GIVE us info about him because we couldn't?) and this excerpt is from the Congressional testimony (of 10/25/2018) Papadopoulos gave under oath: "...And he said, let's meet at the Sofitel, have drinks. And all of a sudden he pulls out his phone -- remember, this phone element again -- and he puts it in front of him and he begins to start talking about Russia and hacking and if I'm involved, if the campaign is involved, if it's benefiting the campaign. Something along those lines..."
Bottom line: If Brennan is asked about when he first saw parts of the Steele Dossier, he is either going to have to lie or take the Fifth. Because he most definitely saw parts of it (all of it, I am certain) in August 2016, because he met with Harry Reid who sent a letter the next day or two demanding that an investigation be started, and in his letter there are components from the dossier that had not been publicly known. So it is most likely Brennan was the one who told Reid, who then sent the letter to the FBI.
It won't happen, but in a Republic ruled by law, he would be convicted of Treason and given the appropriate sentence.
If they know so much about this SPY, why don’t we have his Name??
Well, well, well
Lookie here
We will.
So, who is the whistle blower?
Where does he live? Is he married? Does he have any kids?
Where is is mother? What is her address?
Most politicians are the same. They use their offices to enrich their families and friend on the side, and use inside information and other perks of office to enrich themselves. It’s why the Republicans don’t really have Trump’s back. This, and the bureaucracy, is the swamp. And it is REALLY deep. We need to have a convention of states to completely revamp the whole system, and give power back to the states. Completely do away with federal bureaucracy. Otherwise it’s going to be pitchforks and torches.
Yep. Every day this is crumbling more and more like a rotten cake, Nancy screwed up massively. She announced an impeachment inquiry before she really knew any of the facts. Now she is stuck with all the radicals breathing down her back salivating for impeachment when she knows it will destroy their party ha ha. CHECKMATE!
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
·
2m
“The witness was asked at least 20 times, and there definitely was no Quid Pro Quo.”
@RepMarkMeadows
@FoxNews
Their whole case was built around this, now they no longer mention!
LOL! This is even more flimsy than the Kavanaugh hoax. And look how insane Nancy has the radicals now and all of them are going to be driven more insane when they find out there is no case HA HA HA!....
https://twitter.com/robreiner?
“The name I keep hearing is Michael Barry from CIA Ukraine Desk.”
Maybe the “whistleblower” is a compound character, of several individuals, organizations and supporting Party staff.
We must not be overly attached to antiquated notions of “personhood”, or objective reality, when newer definitions and fresher understandings of reality, would better serve the purposes of the Party.
There's enough here that this guy's name is going to be public before the week is out.
He doesn’t; he never did. We were told that from the get-go. Later, the RAts changed the narrative to say he did.
The commentary about the "whistleblower" statement was very carefully crafted to say that the "whistleblower" had SOME first hand info. The first hand info could have been the names of the people on the phone call, the room where the phone call took place, etc. This would be similar to the parts of the dirty dossier that were declared "accurate".
Nothing of substance in the accusation was first hand.
Is any Republican who is a questioner smart enough to ask this question? If smart enough, willing to expose someone on the left? I have no faith in any Senators or in most Congressmen. Protecting their Princeling way of life seems to be most important to them.
The commentary about the “whistleblower” statement was very carefully crafted to say that the “whistleblower” had SOME first hand info. The first hand info could have been the names of the people on the phone call, the room where the phone call took place, etc. This would be similar to the parts of the dirty dossier that were declared “accurate”.
Nothing of substance in the accusation was first hand.
Good take. Clintonesque use of words and meaning.......
Your are correct. The Clintons were the masters of the weasel words that made statements, designed to deceive, not literally (or usually legally) false. We who followed them became experts at interpreting the meaning behind their dishonest statements. Of course, the propaganda media expands Dems' misleading statements so that the public believes the worst about conservatives that the statements could possibly imply.
“Article 45 clearly states “And Democrats shall be immune from punishment for any crimes, including the murder of Seth Rich, especially if they are running for office where any looking into their crimes will be deemed ‘election interference’””
The next article is that Republicans shall be guilty of Obstruction of Justice for denying accusations, or for exercising any executive or judicial rights for any purpose.
Sadly, my cynical side has wrestled my optimistic side to the ground lately, so I am beginning to agree, but...my optimistic side won’t give up...ever!
That said, Devin Nunes (who by all accounts is tuned into people like Dan Bongino, John Solomon, Sara Carter, and Chuck Ross, all stellar) is one person who might ask...:)
“Normal America is quietly seething and I believe there has to be some internal polling that has spooked the Democrat Party into desperate measures.”
yep. and i suspect the Deep State is totally panicked as well because Barr and/or Horowitz could be on the verge of releasing their investigation results, hence the conspiracy of the two to try to nuke Trump first ... but personally, i think it’s all going to backfire on both of them, and Trump will be re-elected and regain the house, because if America is seething now, then after this charade collapses, the seething will be like pressure cooker about to blow ... if so, the fireworks during Trump’s second term are going to be beyond anything we’ve seen in our lifetime as we see an unfettered Trump go to town ...
Devin Nunes is very solid...He was on Tucker last night. Tucker Carlson has the best show on TV. I cut my cable so I see his show on youtube...just delayed a bit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.