Posted on 09/30/2019 7:43:04 AM PDT by rktman
"We realized that our reported uncertainties were underestimated owing to our treatment of certain systematic errors as random errors," the magazine said of the Princeton-authored piece.
Scientist Nic Lewis, who pointed out the errors shortly after the study was published, said it was "just the latest example of climate scientists letting themselves down by using incorrect statistics."
"The climate field needs to get professional statisticians involved up front if it is going to avoid this kind of embarrassment in future," he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
WND used to be a good site to visit - now, it’s just like any other - way too much sensationalism, too many ‘one weird trick’ links, etc. I virtually never go there anymore - but did so just now to confirm my bias.
I only believe statistics that I doctored myself. - Winston Churchill
LOL! Hey, at least you provided feedback. Hopefully you didn’t get the RED PAGE freeze up. Yeah, it used to be dependable but these days it seems the bottom line is proving to be problematic at a lot of sites.
A lying “climate scientist” is _never_ embarrassed.
They have a planet to save!
(and maybe some white people to kill.....)
Thanks.
Catching the little creeps on method is good. Alarmists have been getting away with everything for a long time... nice first step.
Inadvertent my aching nates. The difference is that amateurs now have computing power in their laptops sufficient to crunch enough data to blow through the misrepresentation that should never have seen print in the first place. I had a professor (long dead these many years, alas) tell me one time that statistics was the most important class I would take as an undergraduate, and he wasn't a statistician. What he was, was right.
statistics was the most important class I would take as an undergraduate, and he wasn’t a statistician. What he was, was right.
Good grief - what a quote.
Gee isn’t the science of global warming settled and a consensus of a handful of scientists agree so why bother with any research? Besides the authors are deniers and are being paid by big oil. We have the dogma of St Algore and that is the last word on all things relating to climate
Thanks rktman.
‘We Really Muffed The Error Margins’: Global Warming Report Rendered Worthless After Scientists...
Townhall | Nov 14, 2018 3:05 PM | Matt Vespa
Posted on 11/14/2018 2:52:14 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3705862/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.