Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WND link so beware. Have had a couple of reports of RED SCREEN warnings lately. Anyway, the info doesn't really apologize and say they're wrong, just the method and info they used was "incorrect". We're still on track to go away in 11.xx years apparently.
1 posted on 09/30/2019 7:43:04 AM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

WND used to be a good site to visit - now, it’s just like any other - way too much sensationalism, too many ‘one weird trick’ links, etc. I virtually never go there anymore - but did so just now to confirm my bias.


2 posted on 09/30/2019 7:52:07 AM PDT by Quality_Not_Quantity (A law means nothing if it isnÂ’t followed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Here’s a clean link to the story on outline.com.

https://outline.com/JZXrJU


5 posted on 09/30/2019 7:59:20 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

A lying “climate scientist” is _never_ embarrassed.

They have a planet to save!

(and maybe some white people to kill.....)


6 posted on 09/30/2019 8:03:19 AM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Catching the little creeps on method is good. Alarmists have been getting away with everything for a long time... nice first step.


8 posted on 09/30/2019 8:17:47 AM PDT by GOPJ (Did Quid Pro Joe's son pay taxes on the $50,000 A MONTH 'earned' from Ukraine graft??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Despite this, a quick review of the first page of the paper was sufficient to raise doubts as to the accuracy of its results. Just a few hours of analysis and calculations, based only on published information, was sufficient to uncover apparently serious (but surely inadvertent) errors in the underlying calculations.

Inadvertent my aching nates. The difference is that amateurs now have computing power in their laptops sufficient to crunch enough data to blow through the misrepresentation that should never have seen print in the first place. I had a professor (long dead these many years, alas) tell me one time that statistics was the most important class I would take as an undergraduate, and he wasn't a statistician. What he was, was right.

9 posted on 09/30/2019 8:29:16 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
"We realized that our reported uncertainties were underestimated owing to our treatment of certain systematic errors as random errors,"

Good grief - what a quote.

11 posted on 09/30/2019 12:09:49 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Gee isn’t the science of global warming settled and a consensus of a handful of scientists agree so why bother with any research? Besides the authors are deniers and are being paid by big oil. We have the dogma of St Algore and that is the last word on all things relating to climate


13 posted on 10/01/2019 12:17:27 PM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

‘We Really Muffed The Error Margins’: Global Warming Report Rendered Worthless After Scientists...
Townhall | Nov 14, 2018 3:05 PM | Matt Vespa
Posted on 11/14/2018 2:52:14 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3705862/posts


15 posted on 10/02/2019 5:39:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson