Posted on 09/27/2019 1:05:47 PM PDT by a little elbow grease
48 Hours after the Trump-Zelenskyy phone call transcript has been made public, and 24 hours after the “whistleblower’ complaint is made public, Things are now becoming much more clear… The whistleblower complaint is the “Schiff Dossier.”
After the 2018 mid-terms, and in preparation for the House “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare Group members to become committee staff.
Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke (link), all are within the Lawfare network. You probably saw Berke questioning former Trump campaign chairman Corey Lewandowski.
It now looks like the Lawfare network constructed the Schiff Dossier, and handed it to allied CIA operative Michael Barry to file as a formal IC complaint. This process is almost identical to the Fusion-GPS/Lawfare network handing the Steele Dossier to the FBI to use as the evidence for the 2016/2017 Russia conspiracy. While Devin Nunes cannot describe the specifics of what I just outlined, he explains the process in the bigger picture.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Source
Former Obama lawyer admits deceiving Congress
12/10/2011, 10:09:07 AM · by Perdogg · 47 replies
washington examiner
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2818616/posts
So, she was betting on the media reports??
I now think Nancy is "compromised".
Schiffty attempted to collude with Russians.
Eisen was or is part of a so-called ‘nonpartisan’ group called CREW
Did you listen to Nunes dissertation at the BEGINNING of the inquiry? It's worth your time.
___________
Interesting.
Confusing... “Schiff dossier” in criminal justice file work would commonly be understood as a dossier on Schiff, for example, a dossier on Schiff as a possible suspect.
p
I never did know why Nunes or others didn’t say something before the one lone GOP congressman did - was that Turner? Yes, it was. I wish they all would stop assuming we have the same opinion of something that they do. “Disappointing to the American public” - we can speak for ourselves, thank you.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“”Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio) while questioning Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire condemned Trump for his July conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which he pushed for an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden’s son.
“Concerning that conversation, I want to say to the president, this is not okay,” Turner said. “That conversation is not okay, and I think it’s disappointing to the American public when they read the transcript.”
Turner went on, however, to question the actual whistleblower complaint, saying the Ukraine conversation is “not what’s in the complaint” and that the complaint is “based on hearsay.” He also called out the House Intelligence Committee Chair Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) for his summary of the Ukraine call earlier in the hearing; Schiff had suggested the “essence” of what Trump said was, essentially, “I want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand?” Schiff would later claim this misleading summary was intended as a “parody.””
https://theweek.com/speedreads/867978/gop-congressman-bluntly-condemns-trump-ukraine-call-not-okay
AND Schiff for brains statement stands without anyone questioning him WHY he thought it was ok to make the statement he made? Why on earth don’t the GOP congressmen behave the same way and let the LSM explode with anger? They need to start fighting fire with fire.. In that hearing, for the most part regarding to what Nadler said, they sat there as tho’ they didn’t hear a word of it! Perhaps they didn’t....
“”Remember the Gerald Walpin affair?””
I absolutely do. That poor man returned to the East Coast and lost his life in a traffic accident in NYC if I recall. That firing never should have happened and he should have made a fight of it to clear his name but I believe he was getting pretty old at the time...His sin was taking on a friend of obozo who went on to become the Mayor of Sacramento.
Since that time I haven’t trusted any IG for any agency - I believe them to be a waste of our tax dollars and our air. I liken them to the TV commercials of the termite inspectors who don’t get rid of termites, they just monitor them. Or the bank guard who doesn’t STOP bank robberies, just there to do what I don’t know! I think they’ve become so similar to the IG’s they don’t even run those TV commercials anymore.
That’s all IG’s do...investigate, write reports and disappear...they don’t even recommend punishment for wrong doing.
Is the IG in this brouhaha going to appear in closed session next week? I think we’ve seen one or two - Horowitz perhaps but how many have ever been in open session?
who did call out schiff on his bogus narrative ?
She did it AFTER we were all advised the transcript at least was going to be released the NEXT day at 2 pm. When I got up, it had just been released at 9 a.m.
We were told that the complaint would be made public later in the week and it became public the same day as the transcript. Wouldn’t want to set my watch on their time table...
That was in my Post #29 - Tucker from OH....the only one to my knowledge to do it. I was moving from room to room - TV to TV and caught the tail end of what he said. It’s confirmed at that post...
thanx. you sure did. i need to read slower. if it was a snake it would have bit me.
“lost his life in a traffic accident in NYC if I recall””
Now that I think about it - it could have been a “hit and run.” Or maybe my mind is just working that way with all the criminal activity we see going on day by day in our own government. Wouldn’t have surprised me if it had been “hit and run.” I’ll have to check it out. No-I guess it was my imagination.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/gerald-walpin-inspector-general-fired-by-obama-dies
My “I’ll have to check it out” reminds me of seeing Warren last night being asked if she thought a son should be working for a foreign business if she were president and after hemming and hawing and waving her arms and generally making a fool of herself said, “I’ll have to check.” Did the questioner ask her what she had to check? Of course not - but I suspect it was to see if she had her brain in gear....
From the comments: Sentient says:
“Since it’s been reported that several democrat congress members contacted Ukraine (this spring?) and threatened to cut off aid if they don’t investigate something or other, maybe Barr should get a FISA warrant on account of their efforts to have a foreign power influence the US elections. Then he could two-hop it to others including Schiff and get all the records of how Schiff and Lawfare crafted this “whistleblower” crap. Use their own methods back at them
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hail yeah
“The FISA 2 step”
Confusing... “Schiff dossier” in criminal justice file work would commonly be understood as a dossier on Schiff, for example, a dossier on Schiff as a possible suspect
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Right
So the “Steele dossier” was actually about christopher steele??
Sure looks like it at this point. A great way to reference it going forward.
The Schiff Dossier.
So the “Steele dossier” was actually about christopher steele??
_______________
LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.