Posted on 09/26/2019 10:13:03 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
This is not the prosecutor who was fired. This is the Biden stooge. This is the prosecutor that was appointed after Biden fired the other prosecutor.
This is not the prosecutor who was fired. This is the Biden stooge. This is the prosecutor that was appointed after Biden fired the other prosecutor.
This is not the prosecutor who was fired. This is the Biden stooge. This is the prosecutor that was appointed after Biden fired the other prosecutor.
And there is no evidence that Hunter Biden can either speak or read the Ukrainian language. So just how useful is a board member, except for influence peddling, who can't even speak the language of the business?
This is not the prosecutor who was fired. This is the Biden stooge. This is the prosecutor that was appointed after Biden fired the other prosecutor.
This is not the prosecutor who was fired. This is the Biden stooge. This is the prosecutor that was appointed after Biden fired the other prosecutor.
And Mitt Romney’s advisor was a long time top level CIA operative. So we’ve got an obscure Ukrainian gas company with a top level CIA guy put on the board after Hunter Biden left the board. Sounds fishy to me.
Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”
Biden approved prosecutor finds Biden innocent. Thats all you should take from this.
The prosecutor quoted in the article is NOT the prosecutor that Biden got fired. Suspiciously, our esteemed media watchdogs have not interviewed the FIRED prosecutor. John Solomon interviewed him, and is getting ready to lower the boom this evening.
Viktor Shokin was being attacked for corruption and malfeasance as prosecutor. There was a long list of Western organizations, governments, and diplomats, as well as Ukrainian anti-corruption groups, that wanted to see Shokin fired. The International Monetary Fund, the European Union, the U.S. government, foreign investors, and Ukrainian advocates of reform wanted Shokin to go. Getting to the bottom of Shokin’s list of opposition may be a useful bit of research that I have little time to do. For instance, my question is was this an orchestrated opposition because of other criminal corruption that served these interests?
What corruption? He wasn’t charged with any crime. As for malfeasance it is Ukraine after all. Go try prosecute corruption in such a country.
That was a globalist operation to rearrange the whole structure. New guy got a list from the Department of State of people NOT TO BE PROSECUTED. That’s basically globalist stooges looting the country since anti-Yanukovich coup. Hunter is actually about the smallest fish in a bunch.
Somebody got to him. They play rough, REAL ROUGH, in that neck of the woods.
You are giving information about what I suspected. There is a bigger story behind the situation with Viktor Shokin.
They are making Ukraine a banana republic without bananas and republic.
There was a largest private bank and IMF said it does things wrong ad they had it nationalized and then brought Biden-likes on board. No official legal action, no fines or charges, just forensic audit by obscure NYC-based company and the bank taken from shareholders by executive orders “to peserve financial stability of the nation”.
Where billions of dollars in US aid and IMF credits to Ukraine gone? It gone back to US but not back to taxpayers for sure.
And Ukrainian taxpayers still owe it and their children for generations too.
Their wages are third of that from before the coup and median income barely covers utilities for a small apartment.
They have worst new car sales since 1967 and worst industrial output since 1959. That makes living standards worse than they had under pre-Brezhnev USSR.
All the country is looted by globalists under pretext of “de-Putinization”.
Did he address the sale of influence regarding paying him $600,000 for illegal access?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.