FULL HEADLINE: "Tulsi Gabbard says U.S. should re-enter Iran nuclear deal, end sanctions in response to Saudi Arabia drone attack"
1 posted on
09/19/2019 10:38:11 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: BenLurkin
It is foolish to think the Iranians are not working on the bomb, even at the expense of their people. Keep the sanctions. Go even harder on them, then let them whither on the vine. I would also make their navy start to disappear. The Persian gulf would be like the Bermuda Triangle for them.
39 posted on
09/20/2019 4:03:30 AM PDT by
USAF1985
(Life doesnÂ’t give you seatbelts)
To: BenLurkin
PS- is she CLUELESS?? Does she really think Iran ever stopped their weapons research and production?? AND the Obama Deal only required them to not work on their nuclear ambitions for 10 years ( not that they were obeying that requirement anyway)
I am deciding that Leftists are either brainless or they just dont care about the World being threatened by the Middle East nations.
41 posted on
09/20/2019 4:13:24 AM PDT by
originalbuckeye
('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..?)
To: BenLurkin
Reentering the Iran deal is a mainstream Democrat position shared by Sanders, Warren and others...Gabbard is not exactly breaking any new ground here.
43 posted on
09/20/2019 4:16:23 AM PDT by
mac_truck
(aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
To: BenLurkin
Liberals:
“Sanctions won’t work against Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, NK”
Also Liberals:
“Sanction South Africa, Rhodesia, Israel”
44 posted on
09/20/2019 4:22:37 AM PDT by
Kozak
(DIVERSITY+PROXIMITY=CONFLICT)
To: BenLurkin
Because the words of a candidate with <1% support carry such weight.
45 posted on
09/20/2019 4:23:26 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(Every liberal should be red-flagged.)
To: BenLurkin
Uh.
Just go do porn, Tulsi.
49 posted on
09/20/2019 5:15:39 AM PDT by
chris37
(Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
To: BenLurkin
I suspect “ex-pat” (supposedly) Iranians in the U.S. are helping to fund her campaign.
50 posted on
09/20/2019 5:25:30 AM PDT by
Wuli
To: BenLurkin
Nothing like opening your mouth, for the sake of it, and expose to everyone that you’re a complete fool.
She just declared herself unfit for POTUS and doesn’t even know it.
56 posted on
09/20/2019 6:12:16 AM PDT by
fuzzylogic
(welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
To: BenLurkin
Checked Fix, couldnt believe Gabbard was on. Democrats are like ants, they are everywhere. Flipped to OAN as usual.
57 posted on
09/20/2019 6:18:21 AM PDT by
ThePatriotsFlag
(We are getting even more than we voted for.)
To: BenLurkin
‘Bout fell outta my chair when I heard her say that.
Surely, that’s just fishin’ for relevance?
58 posted on
09/20/2019 6:18:40 AM PDT by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
To: BenLurkin
Translation: The US should reward Iran’s piracy and act of war (but I repeat myself) by kissing every mullah’s hairy ass. Great idea, now go away.
60 posted on
09/20/2019 6:21:32 AM PDT by
ManHunter
(You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
To: BenLurkin
This would be like saying the USA should have kept supplying Imperial Japan with oil to keep them from attacking American targets. Yep, she went full retard typical 'rat.
61 posted on
09/20/2019 6:22:14 AM PDT by
Sans-Culotte
(If it weren't for fake hate crimes, there would be no hate crimes at all.)
To: BenLurkin
What a traitorous, leftist wench.
64 posted on
09/20/2019 6:44:55 AM PDT by
Jmouse007
(Lord God Almighty, deliver us from this evil in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, amen.)
To: BenLurkin
“...”This this provocation, as you put it, did not just come from out of nowhere, “Gabbard said, responding to MacCallum. “It is a retaliation and it’s a retaliation against the extreme sanctions that are on Iran that’s basically making it impossible for them to sell their oil around the world.”
Using the same logic the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor (which Gabbard may have heard of) could be considered a retaliation against the extreme sanctions (we froze all Japanese assets in July, 1941) that basically made it impossible for them to buy oil around the world.
68 posted on
09/20/2019 8:27:41 AM PDT by
hanamizu
To: BenLurkin
I listened to her, but couldn’t get where her approach would do anything beyond removing the sanctions. She’s confused.
70 posted on
09/20/2019 9:09:01 AM PDT by
damper99
To: BenLurkin
I had a little respect for her, but she just tossed that out the window.
71 posted on
09/20/2019 9:14:00 AM PDT by
KittyKares
(Drain the Swamp)
To: BenLurkin
The only sense in any of Gabbard’s statements here is that she confirms that Trump’s sanctions are working. ;-)
Otherwise, she just sounds like an Iranian mouthpiece, an idiot, or both.
72 posted on
09/20/2019 9:39:42 AM PDT by
Paul R.
(The Lib / Socialist goal: Total control of nothing left worth controlling.)
To: BenLurkin
Thank God Trump ran on and has implemented just the opposite approach.
74 posted on
09/20/2019 12:17:31 PM PDT by
Kazan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson