Posted on 09/17/2019 7:42:12 PM PDT by Kazan
On his nationally syndicated radio talk show The Mark Levin Show on Monday, host Mark Levin warned that if something serious isnt done, Iran will take this attack as a first step.
I will say this, if something isnt done, something serious and significant isnt done respecting Iran, theyre going to take this as a first step, stated Mark Levin. Im just telling you. Theyre going to take this as a first step. So, well see what happens.
Mark Levins comments came after a Saudi Arabian oil facility was attacked by cruise missiles and drones, FOX News reported, that were launched from Iranian soil, and after Iran seized control of another oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz.
Below is a transcript, in pertinent part, of Mark Levins remarks from his show on Monday:
The Iranians are not going away.
So what should the president do? Short of military action and Im not saying we should be short of military action, but if we are what should we do? Should we lift our sanctions? No. There are five areas of waivers that the secretary of states office has argued should not be lifted, that is, they shouldnt be imposed on Iran. Will the secretary of state change his mind now? I hope. There needs to be a lot of pressure on Iran.
I read an article the other day I dont know if its right or not that Irans pension funds are about to collapse, including with the military. Isnt that a good thing? Wouldnt that be great?
So why would we give them a $15 billion bridge loan?
Remember the gentleman who called last week? He had been from Eastern Europe, I believe. No, he was from France, I think originally, now an American. He said, Do you remember how Khomeini would up in Iran? Because the French government released him. The French make very, very stupid foreign policy decisions, which is why theyre a second- and third-tier country. I dont think we need to be taking advice from Macron, whos got 27 percent popularity in France, and has no background on anything, no background on anything.
So the Iranians are pirates on the open sea. They took another oil tanker yesterday.
If you go on the internet you wont read this in many newspapers because the media are the media youll see theyre kidnapping British and Australians and others left and right now.
This attack on Saudi Arabia should grab your attention because of its accuracy, the devastation and the technology involved.
And as I told you before, maybe Rand Paul is not aware of this, the fifth fleet is harbored in Bahrain. Should we withdraw? Should we pull back? How about with China? They took over the South China Sea with their fake islands. Should we withdraw, pull back? Should we take our subs off of the Korean peninsula, remove them too? Where should we go? Where should we go? Just keep pulling back and back and back and let these various threats and enemies grow and grow and grow?
Rand Paul asked a question over the weekend: Why are we in Afghanistan? Is this guy an idiot? Does anybody know why we went into Afghanistan? Anybody? Everybody knows why we went into Afghanistan. Because the Taliban gave safe harbor to Al Qaeda and Bin Laden, and if we take all of our troops out of Afghanistan, what do you think is going to happen?
I mean, how many more times do we have to lose Americans, heroes, blood to go back and fight the same battles, go back and fight over the same territory? Its At one point we had over 140,000 troops in Afghanistan. Were down to 14,000. We have about anywhere from 1,500 to 2,200 special forces in Syria. We have minimal presence in Iraq.
Were not an invading army. Were not going to war with these countries. Were trying to make sure were not attacked yes, from 7,000 miles away that were not attacked. Were not colonialists. Were not conquerors.
I will say this, if something isnt done, something serious and significant isnt done respecting Iran, theyre going to take this as a first step. Im just telling you. Theyre going to take this as a first step. So, well see what happens.
But right now theyre controlling events not the world theyre controlling events.
We win the wars and then Efffff up the end game.
Perhaps with a few exceptions we have not fought a war for the purpose of actually winning it since. Ww2. We flattened Dresden and nuked southern Japan off the face of the Earth. That is how you win wars. Period.
There is nothing neo-con about standing up to a legitimate threat to national security.
Just because the war in Iraq was a mistake doesn't mean the war in Afghanistan wasn't absolutely necessary.
Coddling Iran like Obama did isn't going to work. They can't be allowed to get nuclear weapons. Sure, let the Saudis, with our input, deal with Iran's attack on them. But, Levin is right that the Iranians can't be allowed to think they can get away with an attack on American interests.
Trump will get the blame if Iran ends up killing a significant number of Americans. If that happens, it will because he listened too much to Rand Paul.
Al-Muhajiroun (Arabic: المهاجرون, The Emigrants) is a militant Salafi jihadist network based in the United Kingdom. The founder of the group was Omar Bakri Muhammad, a Syrian who previously belonged to Hizb ut-Tahrir; he was not permitted to re-enter Britain after 2005. According to The London Times, the organisation has been linked to international terrorism, homophobia, and antisemitism. The group became notorious for its September 2002 conference, "The Magnificent 19", praising the September 11, 2001 attacks. The network mutates periodically so as to evade the law; it then operates under many different aliases. --- wikipedia
The Hamburg cell of which Egyptian lead hijacker Atta was a part was led by two Syrians, one a 'former' Syrian intelligence official.
Everything we wanted to accomplish in Afghanistan, we've accomplished -- removing the Taliban from power, installing a US friendly government and killing Osama Bin Laden and most of those responsible for 9/11.
Does this thread remind you of the good old days?
Israel’s just a bit more vulnerable, due to their size.
We lost more Americans on 0/11 than in 17 years in Afghanistan.
And, going to war in Afghanistan, no doubt, has prevented more American lives from being lost in terrorist attacks.
Letting terrorist groups gain strength and have a base of operation to attacks this country and its interests isn't an option.
Correct. And, Muslims have always sought to conquer the world. That isn't going to change. Thus, the reason, we need to assure Islamic terror groups and regimes aren't a national security threat.
How do the American losses on 9/11 and all subsequent terror attacks compare to all American losses in the dozen or so wars since?
We lost nearly 5,000 in Iraq alone. Over 1,500 in Afghanistan.
Somalia. Hell, half of Africa.
Syria.
Libya.
So many others.
Yes, Levin is a NeoCon & has been for decades. Whatever he believes benefits Israel is what he supports in foreign policy, at the cost of American blood & treasure.
Those here calling for nuking Iran sound like John Bolton & the character in Beneath the Planet of the Apes, who said: “May the Blessings of the Bomb Almighty, and the Fellowship of the Holy Fallout, descend upon us all. This day and forever more.”
So you are saying we are done in Afghanistan! I agree! Long past time to depart...we have had under 2K troops there for years and opium production is back at pre-war levels! ;-)
And Trillions & Trillions in debt that cannot be repaid.
To allow Iran to affect this worldwide commodity without any response is a sign of pathetic weakness and shortsightedness.
So let Saudi Arabia do something. Get on the phone with them and get them to do what you want. Get back to us with what the ambassador says they will do.
We werent a part of this, so we have nothing to do. Besides, the US can be happy when Saudi Arabia is crippled because we make more money from oil when our competition is hurt.
Oh, and since you think the world is affected, be sure to contact all the other countries across the world to have them do what you want, too.
Our ships were being attacked by pirates, little thinker.
Oh, do be sure to show us how Iran killed thousands in the 9/11 towers (it was Saudi Arabia) and of how Iran killed our troops in both Gulf wars (it was Iraq).
You dont know $#!+.
It was Iran that held our people for 444 days.
The Saudis, our dear friends, gave us 18 of the 9/11 hijackers, they also grew and supported ISIS as a strategic tool. Moreover, the easiest anti-terror measure we could take is to ban travel from most countries of the Mid-East and North Africa. Should have done that after 9/11, not what Bush/Obama wound up doing.
“So, let Saudi Arabia do something”.
They will. However, they will do so with help. We will be a part of that help. As we should be.
Besides. we make more money...Our oil companies will make more money.
Everyone else will be negatively affected. Every household paying more for gas and paying more for every product which relies on petroleum derivatives.
Every company whose products rely on petroleum dereivitives will either have their botton lines negatively affected which will drop their stock price hurting investors and 401k’s or they will raise their prices hurting consumers.
Your apparent inability to think the implications through is disturbing. There are as many ignorant, emotional people here on FreeRepublic as there are on Democrat Underground or, on PMSNBC. Unfortunately. Sad, but true.
Only 52 people were affected and they were returned.
So, tell us again how that means Iran killed more US citizens than any other country since the 70s?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.